Sometime in the nineties, Siskel and Ebert did a segment on their movie review show where they chose some films that had not done well when released but nevertheless thought deserved to be rediscovered. One of Roger’s was “Cattle Annie and Little Britches”, from 1980, about two young women who become Old West outlaws. Hmmm, I thought, sounds like fun - must check it out.
That turned out not to be easy. None of the VHS rental places had it. It never showed up on the schedules of local revival houses like the Brattle Theatre, but I kept my eyes peeled.
Finally, paydirt - it recently got a DVD release, and was on order at my neighborhood library, so I reserved it, and on Saturday I took it home and sat down to watch my Obscure Object of Desire at long last.
Disappointing! Amanda Plummer, with the crazy eyes (Hunna Bunna from “Pulp Fiction”) was suitably wild as Annie, but a very young Diane Lane as Little Britches was pretty bad, a very flat performance (she has improved), and the two had no chemistry. Worse, they didn’t have much to do until the end, considering that their characters were the movie’s title.
I wanted to see two fierce women cut a swath through cattle country, robbin’ and shootin’ their way to glory, but they’re really just a sidebar to Burt Lancaster as the aging leader of a gang which has fallen on hard times, not a lot of drama in that, and Burt does his Dapper Gentleman thing, the sort of role he does on autopilot, no rough edges, and very unconvincing as leader of a bunch of trainrobbers.
Not a terrible movie, but certainly not what I was hoping for. Sorry Roger.
Have you ever waited a long time to see a film? When you finally got a chance to see it, was it all you were hoping for, or a big letdown?