I’ve noticed that too. It’s always the male who is wrong or an idiot, never the female. Unless its a white woman being made to look foolish by a woman of color.
One example that comes to mind is a laundry detergent commercial with a white woman getting schooled by woman of color about how much water is in her detergent that she thinks is such a great bargain. (That’s not the reason I remember it though, it’s the stupid “how much water is in your detergent” idea. Yeah, the detergent is mostly water. So are people.)
That’s all I can think of at the moment but I know I have seen a few others. If I see them again or think of them I’ll post them.
Hmmmm. . . so a woman of color is making a fool of a white woman by explaining something to her? And that is the only example you can think of? Why am I feeling this uncomfortable feeling I get around wypipo?
It’s not the ads themselves that irritate me but the product. These Human Resources apps that “let” you do your own payroll. No they make you do your own payroll. Isn’t it bad enough that they pay people dogshit, now they have to cover the people in the office too? What? Is the director of HR too busy waxing the CEO’s car or something? HR is HR’s job.
The situations they present are nonsensical as well. “Oh no, I’m on vacation and my paycheck is short 12 hours.” Do people think they get to press a button and solve that problem? Show me a company that just lets their employees pay themselves whenever they think they deserve it and I’ll show you a broke company. The only thing those apps do is make you keep track of everything Human Resources should be keeping track of.
Well, there are the Spectrum ads where the cool, hip smart couple is black, and the un-cool- square couple is white. But they do see the light and convert.
Still not a black woman making a white woman look foolish in the way that kids make adults look foolish and wives make husbands look foolish. It’s like some (not all, not even most) white people feel attacked if colored people are in any way smarter, hipper or even just. . . more explain-y.
I agree here, and I had no issues with the ad at all, But since i consulted with Spectrum for a while and got free cable, I remember them fondly. I thought tha ad was a good one.
CoffeeMate has been running an ad that seems to think it’s a Big Deal[tm] that you can make twenty cups of coffee at home for the cost of getting one at someplace like FourBucks.
The commercials with the red flag instant replay. They always seem to be one-sided.it’s hard to be sure, when the whole concept makes them both look stupid, but it seems the “smug” one is always right.
“You’re Mr Sunroof, therefor, it’s your fault it is open!” The review “proves” this, somehow. But you, Ms Smugpants, were driving. It should be your responsibility, at least as much.
The keys on our old car were designed so that if they were stowed with something pressing one of the buttons, the sunroof would open after a minute or so. I understand how they made the signal strong enough for keys inside the house to open the sunroof in the driveway, but darned if I can figure out how they implemented the rain-making feature.
There is a commercial running for Jublia, a toe fungus treatment. Nothing wrong with it per se but at the end it mentions you have to apply the Jublia daily for 48 weeks. Most products for athlete’s foot, etc take a month or two. I guess slow and steady does the trick.
Oh. And it costs over $700 per bottle which lasts 3 weeks. I looked it up in the Blue Cross formulary and it is listed but only alternatives are covered.
This is more puzzling than annoying, but 4Imprint’s ads make it seem like folks crave clothing and other items emblazoned with their company’s logo. Am I the only one who doesn’t get particularly excited about my company’s logo? Is a promotional item more desirable when your company’s logo doesn’t look like it was designed using a late '90s version of Publisher?