Ah, milroyj, we barely knew ye.

You should be shot for that alone. :smiley:

(Can I be Eric Idle, though? Please please please?)

Well, since then I have read some more of his stuff. I guess I probably just ignored him in the past since he was so ‘out there’. You’re right, the links themselves don’t do the banning just cause, it is the entirety of his behavior on these boards that got him in trouble. I retract the bullshit comment, but I wouldn’t have banned him myself. Yet.

But it is mho that if he had added anything at all to the board but his vitriol towards anything the least bit liberal they might have let some of the warnings slide.

But he added nothing else.

It couldn’t have happened to a more deserving fellow.

Oh please no-this thread will be hijacked to the moon. Lib, if you must, please start a new thread.

Okay much better and waaaay different then this /gag reflex

I thought that was only in that one thread. Which has now degenerated into petty bickering about who owes who an apology.

I wish I had half my class.

It’s tough with someone like milroyj, who makes a habit out of being a complete asshole, but skates carefully and avoids ever explicitly breaking the rules. I mean, half the bannings are precipitated by some sort of meltdown. But milroyj was a sort of low-key asshole, who seemed to only live for the purpose of quietly being a dick.

I suppose it’s not a secret anymore that I wasn’t fond of the guy. :slight_smile:

What’s this-did wring have sex-reassignment surgery and not tell us? :wink:

I don’t know why you’re concerned at this point. My response on that was long ago.

Maybe you’re right. If Wring drops by, perhaps he can clear that up.

It must be a curse. I don’t know whether I’ve ever guessed someone’s sex correctly. I recall that when I first got here, I thought Gaudere was a man, and that DavidB was his SO.


Ha! That’s okay, people have thought I was male on occasion, even though I think my name is fairly feminine.

[hijack]

Is your user ID a combo of Guinevere and Anastasia? I’ve always perceived it that way.

[/hijack]

I must have.

This is the link, and it’s not Kerry. My bad.

Regards,
Shodan

:wink: no worries - I noted in the other thread the gender reassignment, but thought it was a typo, I see that the impression has been corrected here.

no comment on the OP.

forgot to answer this - I only intended my plea for the referenced thread. I don’t read/post so much anymore and am unaware of other altercations the two of you may have had. My only point in that one was that the two of you seemed to be having a tete-a-tete of sorts where only the two of you were responding on that sidebar, and seemed to be talking past each other way past the point where anything productive could occur. Sometimes, it seems to me, that folks can get so embroiled over an issue so that minutia seems monumental. At those times, I think backing away and simply stopping is the smartest thing to do.

But I promise, I’ll only wield my power for the good. really.

So, just so that I am clear, when you make the statement that

You do not mean that, factually, in the last 2000 plus years that people that ate Athiests have killed more people than people that are christians. You have some other secret meaning?

Because, to be honest, it would surprise me to no end to discover that just one more person had been murdered in the last 2000 years by Athiests than by christians, let alone “far more”.

ate=are. Sigh.

Hey, it made a weird sort of sense with “ate.” :smiley:

Yowza. I dodge bullets and don’t even know it. Time to shape up, methinks.