Awhile back, Human Turd (and I say that with all sincertiy) Alec Baldwin promised that if Bush became president, he (and then wife Kim Basinger) would move out of the country.
Well, here we are, more than 4 years later, and the man who promised to leave still lives here, annoying us with his reeking presence, dragging down to the depths of deparvity all good Americans.
Forget the other Human Turds we all know. Samuel L. Jackson. John Travolta. Ted Nugent. Etc.
Alec promised to infect another country. He has not. While his divorce may mean Basinger will move to a separate country than Baldwin, I still demand these two wastes of human space leave.
Go to the light Alec. Or at least France.
As a conjoinder (sp?) to this, I have a theory that Hollywood is secretly conservative, but overtly liberal. My rationale:
-
If a celebrity movie star/rocker/tv star promotes a candidate, no matter how much I agree with them, I want to vote for someone else.
-
These people are masters of PR. They have to know they’re idiots and disliked when their not entertaining.
-
Hence, the bait-and-switch technique.
As my friend put so well, “Well, I was a bit undecided at the time between Bush and Gore, but hearing that voting for George would mean ridding ourselves of two worthless, annoying, overpaid, undertalented, ridiculously embarassing celebrity losers, well then, GO BUSH!” [as a side bonus, the rest of the Baldwin clan would inavriably follow suit]
Does any one else see this as valid rationale, or is the Hollywood system really that bloated, stupid,a nd full of itself? I guess the questions rests on the idea about whether people in Hollywood are more crafty and devious or stupid and ego-engorged.