Oh no!!! I’ve attracted the attention of the half wit. :smack:
I’m laughing because you are one of the dumbest posters on this board with one of the most inappropriate user names on this board. Its clear you know very little about economics and you’re not really smart enough to comprehend the difference between good and evil.
I don’t think I’ve ever read a response by Damuri Ajashi which showed that he actually comprehended the post he was responding to. I think he only reads every other word and the angry voices in his head fill in the blanks.
I’m not familiar enough with Buck Gadot to know if he can fight his own fights or not but his whole post is a conspiracy theory. I could weave equally fanciful tales about anyone. Not much evidence for any of it but why let that stop them.
Interesting. Cite the posts of mine that show that 1) I know very little about economics, and 2) I can’t comprehend the difference between good and evil.
For everyone else: I’m taking bets on whether Damuri Ajashi actually manages to provide a cite written by me.
The post you are responding to asked, and I quote:
which section in the following, exactly, are you saying has something to do with grooming Trump for the Presidency?
Notice how you didn’t address the actual question asked in any way? The whole central thesis of the post you’re responding to, and you missed it. Good job, Captain Comprehension!
Again, I never mentioned treason. But why should you start actually reading what I write now? And a wink and nod certainly can qualify for the formation of an agreement.
Piddling stuff like enforcing the laws. Or are you one of those who think the only reason there is an investigation is to impeach Trump?
Some of us think that lying under oath is and should be a crime. YMMV. And why, in your fevered imagination, do you think they’re lying? For fun? Or maybe, to cover something up?
Again, I didn’t say there isn’t anything there. Indictments are there, for sure. The investigation … that’s there. The firing of Comey, the appointment and then firing of Flynn are there.
Put me down for 25 quatloos on him citing something that doesn’t say what he thinks it says. Seems to be a trend for him.
William Jefferson Clinton might want to discuss that with you.
Anyone thinking about betting should be aware that last time I challenged Damuri Ajashi to cite something he claimed I said, he linked to someone else’s post. Then when called on it, claimed that even if I didn’t write it, I was certainly thinking it.
Fact: Trump had been in talks with Putin associate Aras Agalarov to build Trump Tower Moscow since at least November of 2013.
Fact: accused money launderer Irakly Kaveladze represented Agalarov during that infamous meeting about [del]Hillary[/del] [del]sanctions[/del] “adoptions”.
Standard economic sanctions, particularly when targeted to select goods or individuals, are tools to try and correct the behavior of other states. The current Russian sanctions are nowhere near as global or far-reaching as they would need to be to truly destabilize the ossified nature of Putin’s centralized regime. Only something like an embargo, like the U.S. embargo on most trade with Cuba, is something that is explicitly designed for political destabilization and regime collapse. But as history has clearly shown, even that failed to meet such lofty goals.
2013? Hell, the KGB was working on getting Turmp as an agent, willing or otherwise, at least as far back as 1986. He went to Moscow in July 1987, then bought big ads in September critical of US foreign policy and indicated presidential ambitions. The timing is incredibly suspect.
That didn’t work out, but Russian mobsters/oligarchs have been laundering money through Turmp since the early 90s. That was good enough until the big sanctions hit.
The Magnitsky Act passed in late 2012 and LeRoy spurred Putin into working our small handed Cadet Bone Spurs into the Oval Office. Other than generally spreading chaos at home and abroad, the one specific thing Putin wanted was sanctions lifted.
The cover story about adoptions. Flynn and numerous others getting caught talking to Russians about sanctions relief before taking office. The very first thing Turmp tried to do when sworn in. His refusal to impose the new sanctions passed overwhelmingly.
He’s working for the Russians.
Neither the topic of the thread nor the side of the argument that you were on prompted me to comment on your post. I commented because your post made it clear that you had no interest in anything that was being said.
If you’ve no interest in the topic that you’re debating, then I would question your motives in posting. And with a lack of engagement with the topic so flagrant, I think it’s fair to say that you’ve no expectation of credibility among anyone reading your posts. You’re just wasting your own and everyone else’s time.
To be sure, that’s your right. But I fail to see how that’s serving you or anyone else any good in life? If you’re grumpy, bitching about things that you’re not really interested in on the Internet is probably not the most healthy strategy for filling your days.
You’re way confused. The Mueller probe didn’t start with Russian hackers. It started with allegations of Trump supporters meeting with Putin supporters who wanted to get Russian sanctions lifted.
Again, why would Trump supporters meet with Putin supporters? Again, haven’t conservatives been describing Russia as American enemies for decades? How come they changed their tune? You remember, the people who stole Crimea from the Ukraine and against who most of the world and the US agreed to impose sanctions? The ones who took Assad’s side in the Syrian conflict and drove millions of refugees to swamp Europe? The ones who sell arms to NK? The Putineers aren’t exactly reliable trading partners.
Cease your feeble attempts to distract us from Trump supporter criminal activity with
yet even more squawking about Hillary. She’s gone. She’s powerless. That mean ol’ liberal lady is’t around to scare you any more.
A tough guy???
Oh please. Trump is a mouthy (yet whiney) bitch. He’s the yappy little dog you love to kick. Cadet Bone Spur, the guy who got deferments because he was just a chicken shit draft dodger, is not tough by ANY means. The asshole who thinks taking advantage of crooked deals and lording it over employees, is not a tough guy. He’s only “tough” against anyone who can’t fight back.
He’s a damn pussy, a punk ass bitch, a fake and a wannabe.
They don’t have anything else. I put this Damuri Ajashi on IGNORE a while back. I’m not sorry about that. He’s just not worth my time.
The intelligence of the long time conservatives I’ve cited is certainly higher than that of a long time poster who would be described as a liberal anywhere south of Maryland, I’ll give you that much. Then again, so is my laundry basket.
Empty.
+10
“The buck stops…well, somewhere over there.”