I saw this story online today.
The gist of it, if you don’t care to read it (and I don’t know if registration is req, or not) is that two boys have plead guilty to assault for “brooming” up to 18 younger boys at summer camp. As part of the plea deal the indictment has been reduced from 18 counts to one. Considering that one of the boys pleading guilty is the son of the State Senate Majority Leader my cynicism is already jumping when I see that the story has this son of privelege presumably getting away with what sounds to me (on first pass) anal rape.
You see, my immediate definition of “brooming” would be having a broomstick, or similar object, shoved up some poor schlub’s rectum. And I was about to get pretty pissed off that any judge would let this be excused to any degree.
Well, my immediate definition of “brooming” was wrong. From the article:
This change does not mean that the act is suddenly acceptable, but it seems a Hell of a lot less serious than some of the parents quoted in the article are making it seem. The parallels to rape are being draw that I would have expected with an actual anal rape, and calls for sexual assault charges.
So, basically, I’m here to call for a nice Pitting of the kid(s) involved with this for abusing their authority to deliberately humiliate the campers in their charge. That’s reprehensible, and dispicable. While I don’t think that you are guilty of sexual assualt, you are guilty of more than one single count of something. If this plea deal holds, I hope that you take it as an extraordinary mercy, not something you are entitled to recieve because of your father’s position.
I also want to Pit the kid’s State Senate Majority Leader father: If you’ve allowed your position to be used to force the criminal justice system to give your son a bye you’re a despicable bastard. And I hope you pay for it come the next election. And at the moment, any time a charge count goes from 18 to one, I tend to suspect that behind-the-scenes leverage was applied. At this point, I believe it’s up to you to prove that you didn’t influence things.
Finally, to those families and family lawyers who are claiming sexual assualt as being the appropriate charge for this incident: You’re sounding like idiots. What happened was wrong. Humiliating. And should be punished. But it was not sexual assault. By making that comparison you’re weakening the rest of your case, by leaving the idea that if you’re going to exaggerate for shock effect on part of your accusations, you might do it for all of them.
Decry the perception of cronyism all you want. Decry the way that two priveleged boys seem to be getting a bye from the criminal justice system. Don’t exaggerate the real wrongs done to your boys into something that didn’t happen. If for no other reason than it’s likely to leave your sons with the idea that it did happen. With all the emotional and psychological trauma that can entail.