Allah Does Not Love You (Chick Tract).

For me, it’s the ubiquity of those damned little things. I’ve had them left on my door, on my porch, in my mailbox, etc., several times. I’ve found them in ICU waiting rooms, doctor’s offices, dentist’s offices, in the forms rack at the courthouse, in books at the public library, even once in the tray of a Coke machine. I left a gay bar once to find the “Sodom” one under my windshield wiper and found one another time after coming out of an arthouse theater showing JESUS OF MONTREAL.
Admittedly I live in the small-town south, so the problem may not be as pronounced other places. For me it isn’t the influence exerted by Chick, which is minimal- he’s confirmation bias if there ever was such an “author”- it’s the mentality that his “tracts” reflects that’s so disturbing. The near absolute ignorance of those who believe his writings is incredible, and the depiction of a God that I can’t even imagine anybody with even a trace amount of compassion worshipping is disturbing enough to warrant an occasional mention on these boards.

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0055/0055_01.asp
big daddy?

Re: http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0042/0042_01.asp

That’s what’s so hysterical about this particular Chick tract.

CHRISTIAN TOURIST: “Look! See? This pre-Islamic statue of a moon god looks like the symbol for Islam!”
MUSLIM MAN: “<GASP> Oh, my goodness! You’re right! That obviously proves that my whole religion is a lie and that therefore Jesus is the One True Way!”

(Maybe Jack Chick just wishes it were that easy to convert people.)

Dang, I must be lucky. I’d never even heard of the Chick sect until I began to read SDMB.

Um, maybe this is niave, but what do Muslims believe about Jesus claiming to be the Son of God? Do they believe he was lying? Mistaken? Or do they simply not believe that he ever said such a thing?

That’s what I wanted know as well…

Did some looking and found…

From here.

But that doesn’t really address Jesus claiming to be the Son of God – it addresses whether he IS the Son of God and whether he claimed to be a god. Sort of different, isn’t it?

Well, the sad thing is how the uneducated take Chick so literally. Jack Chick to me, is the epitomy of religious fanaticism, and the problems inherent to religion but more specifically Christianity. I don’t have a problem with most Christians, but I have a huge problem with fundamentalists.

The site linked by Azeal addressed the issue pretty unambiguously. What then is the Christian response?

It does? Not in the part he quoted, and it’s a LOT of text to look through… I don’t see it. Show me where it says Jesus lied/was mistaken/never said he was the Son of God.

If that wasn’t clear enough for you Cessandra (and I’m not sure it was for me either) then here’s another site that might give you more perspective.

http://www.answering-christianity.com/at.htm

The gist it seems, is that Muslims do not believe that Jesus ever made the literal claim that he was God, instead that has been a dogma built up in the Christian Church.

Someone please correct me if I have it wrong… we seem to be in short supply of Muslims here lately.

I have yet to see either in this particular thread.

I actually meant to quote this one.

Martin

I doubt either one is on the net.

or at least use nick’s on the messageboard.

Simply…We do not believe that Jesus ever claimed Divinity or any relationship to The Creator other than Prophethood. If The New Testament is percieved to make such a claim, it is due to misinterpretation, mistranslation, or a corrupted text.

In any Prophetic Message, only the actual words of the Prophet are considered to be valid. The words of observers are mere commentary, not divinely inspired. The words of writers 40+ years after the fact are less reliable. The four Canonical Gospels are of value as a glimpse of oral tradition regarding Jesus at the time of their writing.

Martin

The token muslim, it seems:D