OK. So I recently returned from a trip to Michigan. While I was away, my 8-month-old puppy, CornPone (and my rats) stayed with my friends Robyn and Mary.
Some things you should know:
-
Robyn and Mary are the people from whom I got the puppy (Robyn found her abandoned in a dog park).
-
Robyn and Mary kept the puppy for about two months before I took possession of her (and I’d only had her for about two weeks when I went on my trip).
-
Robyn REEEEEEEALLY (REEEEEEEEEALLY!) wanted to keep the puppy permanently (and as a result stalled as long as possible before letting me take her), but Mary said NO, on the grounds that they have NINE animals in their house as it is…
-
…so one of the conditions of my adoption of the puppy (imposed by Robyn, who was heartbroken when I took her) was that I had to bring her back for weekend stays at their house from time to time. Cool with me.
Because of #4, I thought that leaving CornPone with them while I was in Michigan (my other dogs went elsewhere to stay) might be ideal. I mentioned it to Robyn, and she said yes, she’d LOVE to keep the puppy while I was gone! Then she mentioned that she’d be sitting for a couple of other dogs at the same time (and would have to enlist Mary’s help with CornPone), so I offered to just take CornPone to the boarder with my other dog, so as not to be an added imposition.
She declined my offer, and seemed really excited about CornPone’s visit.
Anyway, on to the point.
While I was away, CornPone ate a pair of Mary’s (favorite) shoes.
My question: Am I obligated to buy Mary a new pair of shoes?
Let me make a few things clear:
-
I am going to offer to replace Mary’s shoes.
-
I am not grousing about having to replace the shoes.
-
Nor am I patting myself on the back and waving the Generosity Queen scepter because I am going to replace the shoes.
My point here is that although I will be happy to replace the shoes (assuming they’re not Manolo Blahniks or something), I do not feel obligated to do so. Yet when I mentioned the whole thing to my mother (saying jokingly that the little thank-you-for-keeping-my-dog gifts I brought back from Michigan for Robyn and Mary now seemed a bit paltry), she said that I was absolutely obligated to do so.
Sure, I felt kind of bad about the shoes, and I figure replacing them is the nice thing to do, but if I didn’t have the money or something, I would not feel–under these particular circumstances–that I was Sinfully and Irredeemably Rude and Bastardly for not doing so.
I know that this hardly matters in the Great Scheme of Things, but I consider myself to be a polite and thoughtful person, so this little disagreement with my mom over whether or not replacing the shoes is my duty in this situation has got me wondering…
Am I wrong?
P.S. Robyn still wants me to bring her back some weekends, but if she’s gonna go eating stuff I’m gonna HAVE to replace…

