Actually, the point I was trying to make is that we shouldn’t construct relationships around this idea, and that relationships should be about looking out for and helping others. Yes, it is true that I am disappointed with the responses, and I’m sorry that I was unable to sympathize with them more. But it’s not because I’m trying hard to maintain my current perspective, or because I have difficulty admitting being wrong; if you sift through my past posts, you can find plenty examples of me admitting being wrong. In fact, there’s one from yesterday.
Anyway, the reason I’m not willing to get on board with the mainstream opinion here is because certain people on this thread seem to be suggesting that we adopt borderline antagonistic relationships with people where you never intervene or say anything when you can save them some trouble, because then you’re enabling their irresponsibility or something. To some degree, I understand it, especially when we’re talking about nagging-- but it appears to me that these people feel very fervently about this in all spheres and magnitudes (to me nagging is not the same as speaking up). I truly wonder if these same people would not be bothered if a close friend deliberately neglected to tell them something that cost them somehow. I don’t mean to make a mountain out of a molehill about a subway ticket, but at the same time, what harm does it do for you to say something if you notice-- especially to someone you know very well, and are very close to? I find it hard to believe that no one here who was in those shoes would question the psychology of the friend’s decision, and would instead just laugh it off. Even if you are able to admit your errors, could you feel completely comfortable about the behavior of a friend who, say, repeatedly stands by quietly as you mistakenly waste money or effort? Would it not at least cause you to question the nature of your friendship?
There is a very painful piece of my family’s history in which someone close to me ended up dead because someone else who knew certain information decided to not say anything, for reasons that they were never able to explain. Perhaps this unfortunate incident is in a different league, one much more serious, but I always think back to this story when I think about situations in which people not piping up at the critical moment can allow bad things to happen to others.
Anyway, I can accept on an intellectual level that I’m wrong, but honestly, I’m not sure if I feel it in my heart yet, except to say, like someone mentioned earlier, that the decision to say something in these situations might be right for me, but not necessarily for everyone else. That’s the best I can do for now.
Anyway, thanks for the thoughts, everyone, particularly to Manda JO and pbbth. Your words resonated with me more than anything else in this thread.