o_O
Well. I see what you mean. But I wouldn’t have seen it first.
That reminds me of a joke some comedian told a while back:
“Back before the internet, we had to use fucking clouds for masturbating material.” This just expands the scope to include celestial bodies. 
Well, stars are being born right in the middle of it.
This thread begs for a reference to Uranus.
A gluteus? I don’t see…
Oh, thanks. Now it looks like a Goatse-style rectum. All your fault.
To be accurate, NGC 6302 is really one of the hottest stars in the galaxy, but with underlying facets of instability and bipolarity. This inevitably leads to a voyeuristic exposé of the inner heavenly body and discarded outer layers, whilst amassing media interest. Following this attention, the ongoing phenomena become less visible, to the point of redundancy for any casual observer. Very much like Lindsey Lohan.
Maybe the name “Gassy Sphincter Nebula” was already taken…?
Well it was beautiful… thanks for that.
Before we had Hubble, we had Rorschach.
Just don’t look up the goatse nebula.
That’s not the Butterfly Nebula, it’s the Guadeloupe Nebula.
Goatse cloud. No it’s not real.
No. It looks like labes to me.
It looks like the Tron Sailship to me.
So do psychiatrists still use Rorsarch(or how ever the hell you spell it)cards to evaluate people?
Well doctor ,that one looks like a naked woman.
That one looks like a naked woman with her legs open…
Yes thats definitely two women having lesbian sex…And that one is…
Excuse me mate I’m a painter and decorator not a psychiatrist,
And thats a wallpaper chart that I’ve been showing you.