Over a year ago, I got a warning from Jonathan Chance. I protested this warning twice, believing it to be an uneven application of a standard – that is, I believed my words were judged more exactingly than others’ words had been in previous interactions.
Over the past year, however, I have gradually come to realize that I was wrong. The issue was not that my words were judged more exactingly, but rather that Jonathan Chance was applying a more exacting standard across the board. So to speak.
I was wrong in my earlier protest, and in any suggestion that any less even-handed motive was in play.
I did not, and have not, changed my more general view that bias persists here. I have come to believe that the particular instance I mention was not the result of bias.
Look, if I am convinced I’m wrong, I apologize. Your comment seems to suggest this is a poor trait. I don’t agree.
Or,
[ul]
[li]Reflect on past behavior.[/li][li]Live life, continuing to grow and mature[/li][li]View past events in different light [/li][li]Profit (spiritually)[/li][li]Share with others [/li][/ul]
I think he’s asking for a link to the two protests Bricker mentioned in the OP, presumably thread(s) in ATMB, not the original thread where the warning occurred.
I was hoping for the same thing to better understand what Bricker’s reasoning was, but not interested enough to search it out on my own.
Ah, that may be. Well it’s a slow day at work so I have time to do a search and it looks like Bricker did not start any threads about it, so perhaps he made his protests via PM.
