Well, for the people who are saying “The thread title should have been enough warning”, I would point out that people do start threads in MPSIMS, GQ, Cafe Society, and IMHO with cutesy joke risque titles like “Eating Ass”, and then when you open the thread, it turns out to be something like recipes for donkey meat.
[sigh]
…so there would have been no particular reason to expect this thread to be anything other than yet another cutesy joke risque thread title.
Yeah, like my thread about Wet, Smelly Pussies were about how my cats, Buffy and Gypsy peed in their carriers on the way home from the vets’.
Thanks for the input TVeblen, your point of view helps clarifiy **UBs** decision. I didnt realize that the boards had been awash with a wave of sexually explicit material as of late. I also thought , sincerely, that the topic might serve a general interest since the board seems to an open minded arena and this (exact) topic had not been discussed before - to my knowledge.
I also think that instead of “I’ve heard enough of this story” UB could have said, “Please reconsider your content next time”, or “I challenge the decency of this thread”, something along those lines…
My first thought was that someone else had posted a similar thread earlier and that mine was redundant or a copycat.
I appreciate the effort taken by UB to defend his position.
birdgirl I disagree with your stance that some men (people) equate “ass play” with homosexual behavior. If that were true you would not have any straight men admit that they perform anal sex on thier women partners. I don`t think any men (that I know anyway) would have a problem discussing “ass play” or rimming in the context of he on she. What made the the topic thread worthy, in my opinion (and which you pointed out), was that it was performed on a male by a female (rare) and that it was done in such an instinctive, and spontaneous manner.
I doubt that any homosexual overtones were read into the thread by any members of the SDMB.
“Speak for yourself”, says matt_mcl
Since the thread is still open, would anyone like to comment on the original OP and the act itself (female on male rimming)?
I’d love to, but now I don’t know if we’re allowed to do it.
Whatever. Good topic, maybe we can discuss it some other time when Bush declares a war on sodomy or something.
Thanks for the more complete explanation TVelben. I also was not aware that there had been a rash of these sorts of threads lately (guess I’ve been looking in the wrong places!). I can certainly respect those reasons.
Duck Duck Goose, perhaps you’ll be glad to see that whuckfistle seems to have taken your suggestions on thread titles seriously. Maybe a bit too seriously, but nevertheless…
You can never be too serious. (especially with usernames like Duck Duck Goose, and whuckfistle.)
I didnt know you couldnt code in the title though. Huh!