And now: What about all those cops turning their backs on De Blasio?

Obviously those cops are just thugs and murderers. Derp. :rolleyes:

What “professional duties” were being “pursued” in the case under discussion here?

Disrespecting the family of the officers that were killed, at the funeral? They pre-empted it to behave like spoiled brats.

It’s simple. Exercise all the free speechin’ you want. But don’t turn a funeral into a circus, and don’t be wearing the uniform when you do it. Because then you are pretending it is an official position, and using the uniform (pretense of authority) to do it.

Basic Ethics 101

I’d be interested to know if those who are pushing the insubordination angle would support disciplining all public employees who go on strike as well. That seems quite a bit more overt and impactful than simply facing away from an image of the mayor.

The cops have an explicit right to assemble peaceably to petition for a redress of grievance. Whatever I may think of the timing and setting of their demonstration, I strongly disagree with any sanction or penalty for it.

I am surprised, of course, that the Mayor could reach out with his mind all the way to Baltimore and seize a mentally unstable man to do his bidding. No way he could do such a thing, so it must have been Obama. Voodoo originated in Kenya, you know. That’s a true fact, you could look it up. Ghoulggle it.

Attending that funeral was not a professional duty. But you know that, and are just making something up because you really, really want these guys to be punished. They won’t be, of course, and you know that, too.

Since when was “basic ethics” a part of the constitution? Nor is “turing a funeral into a circus”. Those are social norms, not constitutional prescriptions.

Well, it’s difficult to attract somebody to work in a job that they’re used to viewing as the enemy. And it is difficult to see as being “on your side” someone who calls you “ma’am” if they think you’re a white citizen but stares at you like you haven’t showered in years if they think you’re one of “dem imgrants”.

Standing around in uniform sounds a little like a professional duty.

I, for one, don’t think they did anything unconstitutional. I think they’re petulant cockholes.

Does anyone know if you’re required to not act like a cunt while in uniform in NYC?

It’s NYC, they joke that they consider “being an asshole” a requirement for residency. Not everybody I’ve encountered in NYC was an asshole, but those who were appeared to revel on it.

What bizarre logic is this?

The issue here is the overt mass display of contempt for the mayor, and the various implications of that, that have been pointed out throughout this thread. That is not at all the same thing as a typical strike by unionized workers, which isn’t generally seen as a display of contempt in the same way as this.

Interestingly enough, it appears that standing around in uniform is now the bulk of a NYPD officer’s professional duty.

One might argue that disrespecting the mayor isn’t a fireable offense, but I think not doing your fucking job is very much a fireable offense.

I seriously doubt that the NYPD is any more racist than the general population. In fact it might be less racist, given that the NYPD actually has contact with the racial groups that the general population is racist against. This probably leads to a more nuanced understanding of people than the general population might have.

However, the reality is that the overwhelming majority of the NYPD, and all other police forces, do see the world as divided between the uniforms and the civilians. When push comes to shove that loyalty is a necessary “evil” . . . but it doesn’t make it not “evil”.
See: Frank Serpico’s bad ear.

Since such subtleties are obviously lost on you; Hitler hitler hitler Hitler hitler HITLER hitler!
Maybe you understand that?

CMC fnord!

This whole situation is really offensive. De Blasio hasn’t done anything wrong from what I see. Most people with black children have to have that talk about how to deal with the police, because police can be scary and abusive if you are considering among societies margins.

Now the cops are blaming the mayor instead of themselves. Typical bully behavior. Some cops demand unconditional support from society, even if they have done many things to damage their own reputation.

Well, the conservative umbrage over de Blasio admitting to having The Talk is that they don’t believe The Talk is warranted by the facts. The Talk, to these conservatives, is inherently a vile stereotype against cops. They view the idea that blacks are at greater risk than whites of being treated unfairly or harmed by the police without cause as an offensive slur against police that was basically made up by liberal politicians (Obama and Holder especially), the media, and agitators like Al Sharpton. To these conservatives, the fact that lots and lots of black families share this perception says more about the ignorance, blame-shifting, and search for victimhood of black people than it does about cops.

That’s the view, anyway, I’ve gotten from my dear, beloved in-laws the past two weeks. I think they’re full of shit, but it’s very difficult to shake people from this mentality.

You could try evidence.

It wouldn’t do much for my conservative relatives, I know, but maybe you’ll have better luck.

(There are issues with this analysis, which are noted in the article, mainly stemming from the fact that there’s no mandatory reporting of fatalities caused by police; it’s all voluntary which could skew the numbers. I think, and the authors agree, that the difference is far too vast to be accountable to insufficient data alone)

I knew that, I was being sarcastic.

Also I know the difference between the Constitution and basic human decency. Just because it is not illegal or unconstitutional, does not mean it isn’t extremely bad form. You can be fired or disciplined for a lot of things that are not mentioned in or protected by the Constitution.

Or, as Lobohan said in post 248… something about stupid cock holes.

Oh. Nevermind!

They stand around real good, when they should be doing something, but then are top notch apparently when it comes to “being overzealous” against unarmed suspects.

In short, the NYPD is striking because their feelings are hurt by something a politician said. How any conservative law-and-order type can be ok with this is beyond me. Can we drop the charade of calling these people New York’s “finest?”