Just looked at the second page of the OP’s link. Eewgh?
Legally adult 20-year-old rentboys are one thing, but… :eek: Am I being too suspicious here?
Just looked at the second page of the OP’s link. Eewgh?
Legally adult 20-year-old rentboys are one thing, but… :eek: Am I being too suspicious here?
Sadly, probably not.
-Joe
If you’re implying that he’s a pedophile, probably. If you’re implying that he boned the 16 year old who’s denying to comment, probably not.
“Massage, good times, Travel, escort for days, nights and weekends, My name’s Geo. 20 year old, 5’9’‘, 130 pounds, 28’’ waist size,8x6” UNCUT, VERSATILE, NICE ASS. Puerto Rican . . ." Wait, PUERTO RICAN?! :eek: Rekers is a race-mixing scumbag! :mad:
“Carry your bag, sir?”
Excerpts from his wiki:
There you go- he was doing research and therapy. It’s a much better excuse than needing help with baggage anyway.
How charming, and what better way to promote your own books and organizations than to fuck up the life of an adopted child? After all, that way there’s always going to be at least one person who’ll always remember you.
Strangely neither the website for NARTH nor Facts About Youth have any mention of their free publicity.
They go to a restaurant together. “Sir, would you like a doggy bag?” “No thanks, I brought my own.”
“Is this your bag, sir?”
“No, this is definitely not my bag!”
“Just as we thought…”
“Follow in your books and repeat after me as we learn three new words in Turkish. Bath. Coffee. Rentboy. May I see your Facebook, please?”
“Ah! The rentboy, he is part of your family! …”
Maybe he took a shower with the rentboy to show him how big his penis is? I hear it cures teh gay.
Didn’t he save any of the money he made from SWEENEY TODD or his upcoming role asGrindelwald in HARRY POTTER?
Nah, let her walk 
Someone on the board once provided a provocative explanation for these guys: It could be that right-wing gay homophobes are simply not aware that most men who identify as heterosexual have no or very little erotic attraction to other men; they figure that all men feel attraction to guys and that others are just better at suppressing it.
For them, “gays” are not people who are attracted to the same sex (like them), but people who’ve depravedly decided there’s nothing wrong with it.
Accordingly, there’s nothing hypocritical about boffing a rent boy and working against queer rights; boffing the rent boy was a moral lapse due to weakness, and they’re trying to do “better” by redoubling their efforts against “homosexuality.”
When you think about it, I bet that cognitive stance makes the whole thing even kinkier to them in a way. Forbidden fruit and all that…
Here we go – it was bup, here.
I remember when this sort of thing hypocrisy wasn’t commonly coming to light as it is now. Has a significant portion of the gay community stopped covering for these noisy hypocrites and started arranging outings?
I thought that Appalachian Trail was code for a secret gay affair so that the true Brazilian Trail would not be discovered out in the bush.
And let’s not even get started on the Oregon Trail. ‘Caulk the wagon’ indeed.
Now I understand the phrase Fanny Pack…
I’m beginning to think that the best part about these stories is the almost unlimited opportunities for puns and in-your-end-o.
You win the thread. 