Another ornament to the teaching profession

I’m 30. And you know, I *had *realized it before but was willfully denying it. After all, I rather like boys and have my very own at home. But the truth shall no longer be denied!

:confused:
She’s not that ugly. Actually, I’d say she’s about average looking for her age. If I was desperately horny I’d probably do her.

Freud, meet slip…

I’ll thank you not to judge the entire gender by the yardstick of a 14-15 year old boy with “behavioural difficulties”, hon. :rolleyes:

– Emo Phillips

I didn’t. I said “boys”, really. Unless you’re saying all men are boys, and, jokes notwithstanding I don’t really believe that.

There’s some truth to the notion that adolescent boys leaking testosterone from every pore will be only too grateful for the use of any warm hole, but seriously, plenty of young guys will turn it down even if it’s on a plate, if the offer is coming from a thorough-going skank. (There’s also the borderline class, of girls you’ll shag but not admit to it, although admittedly in my particular case both this and the preceding example were purely hypothetical.)

Update from the paper (no online cite as yet, sorry): Four years in the hoosegow. The way it usually works, she’ll be out in about half of that.

Apparently when the shit first began to hit the fan she first denied everything and then tried to claim she had been raped. But counsel for the defence said in mitigation that she accepted full responsibility for her actions.

Well yes, I guess when absolutely cornered with cast-iron proof of what she did and no way out whatever, yes she did. :rolleyes:

Offensive. Unnecessary. And do you think people only have sex with some select group of people who meet your standards of attractiveness?

Not only is it what he thinks, it’s true!

Anyway, I’m sure that like good reconstructed citizens of the equality era, most of us enlightened ones (unlike Malacandra spit) can find it within ourselves to look past this lady’s troll-like exterior and appreciate the true beauty of the statutory rapist within.

Or something.

sigh

Nothing like reading for context, is there? I was merely heading off at the pass the oft-repeated line about “Well, if only some hot teacher had done me when I was 15!” by pointing out that “hot” was the last thing this specimen was. :rolleyes:

And you could see that was what I was saying from further up the thread.

You know, you could have become outraged at the notion of a 49-year-old teacher abusing the age difference and the custodial relationship, the fact that she not only denied everything but tried to make out the victim had raped her, the convenient decision to plead guilty when it finally dawned on her she was going to be hung out to dry, the pitifully light sentence… no, you’ve got to rag on me for so much as mentioning that a woman could possibly be physically unattractive even by my none-too-stringent standards.

Don’t mind me, but when I’m talking about sex criminals, I kinda reserve the right to be as offensive and unnecessary as I like, m’kay? Other ugly people can have sex with whomever they like, for all I’ve ever had to say on the subject.

Beautiful! :smiley:

:confused: :eek: :dubious: . . . :smiley:

Does that actually work?

Uh, “research”

When I was in high school, there was this guy whose sister interrupted a “pumpkin session” when she entered his room unannounced. He thought he was alone in the house. The brother was around 15, sis was a year younger. Sister and brother were “mortal enemies”, so the first thing sis did was to blab all over what she had witnessed. I have no idea what he did with his life, but if I ran into him today, my first thought would be, “hey, it’s the pumpkinfucker”.

Do they call me McGregor the Bridgebuilder?

No, I read the whole thread. I just disagree with your presentation of the problem.

Oh, right. Well, come back when you’ve something to say, and we can discuss it, maybe. You can start out by explaining what you think my “presentation of the problem” is, if you like.

She’s a fuckin’ pig!

I just figured they were trying to clue us in as to what, exactly, the “sex act” was. :smiley:

She probably looks better with makeup on. Or a bag over her head. Heck, maybe the boy did her doggy-style, in which case he wouldn’t have to look at her face at all.

Umm…not to open a can of worms or anything, but…is it really so hard to believe that perhaps, maybe, the boy WANTED to fuck her? He’s 15, for cripes sake. In many countries (and even some U.S. states), that’s not even a crime. Why must we presume that he was abused, raped, taken advantage of, when all we’ve got is a CNN blurb to go by?

Don’t get me wrong, I’m NOT condoning their actions, not at all. It’s cleary inappropriate, especially with a figure of authority. But it does get my hackles up when a person that age is automatically treated as a helpless, victimized child; whereas, across the English Channel, he’d be treated like a responsible adult.