Hey, Larry. You’re behind the times. It’s no longer autism that vaccines cause. Vaccines cause GAY people. Know why? It’s because people who are vaccinated get to live long enough to discover their own sexuality. 
Vaccines cause you to get all old and wrinkly, and make your hair turn grey. Yuck.
Vaccines cause cancer. Seriously, how many people get cancer that would have died of smallpox before vaccines?
Every time we save a child from dying of a childhood illness, we increase the chances that they die of an age related illness.
Evil vaccines are keeping me away from Jesus!
I guess vaccines also cause repetitive posts.
I must disagree.
A trusted expert. A trusted expert. As in singular. And he couldn’t have been trusted by the anti vaxxers because, really, they had no idea who he was. They just knew he said what they already believed. As opposed the massive number of experts who contradicted him.
And they still cite him after he has been thoroughly discredited. Not because they trust him, but because he said what they already believed. As opposed the massive number of actual experts who contradicted him.
They got stuck in the hole because they believe they are right and reject any and all evidence that says they may be wrong. Fighting ignorance is one thing. Fighting willful ignorance is something different.
As the saying goes ‘You Can’t Reason Your Way Out of Something You Didn’t Reason Into’.
You guys know that anti-vaxxers are ignorant scumbags that kill children, right? I mean, think about that…it’s true. They are ignorant scumbags that kill children. Why even attempt to debate with one, especially when every one of his assertions is so easily debunked that it literally takes less than a minute to find the cites. Every one of his assertions has in fact been debunked within a few posts.
They are ignorant (seriously) scumbags (definitely) that kill children (by their ridiculous stupid assertions based on ignorance and that kill a lot of children, especially in the 3rd world). Why debate fucks like that??
Sometimes it isn’t a debate per se-it is more a case of not letting dangerous misinformation stand unopposed in a public forum.
As Czarcasm says, the reason to respond (up to a point) is not through any expectation of changing the mind of an ignorant scumbag who cares nothing about facts or evidence, who seeks only to bolster his preposterous conspiracy theory even if it costs the lives of thousands of children. It’s for the benefit of parents who may also be reading and may not be familiar with the issues, those with a genuine interest in the real facts about vaccines.
when did you stop fkng your wife, after the honeymoon?
Well, yes. Almost by definition.
Everybody who currently has or ever had a wife has either stopped or will stop fucking their wife after their honeymoon (well, except for those poor souls who die before or during their honeymoons). This is basic logic. No matter how well or poorly the marriage goes, everybody will eventually die and thus stop doing much of anything, much less fucking.
I suppose this was your attempt at a clever retort. It amply demonstrates the intelligence we’ve come to expect based on your other posts.
cite a study, that where one group is vaccinated against whatever e.g., measles, chickenpox, shingles etc, and the control is un-vaccinated. The study should be well designed, where in the control and the test subjects are similar etc,
now… cite the study where the vaccinated group after a period of time…e.g., 1 year 2 years etc, had no occurrences of the disease because of vaccination. but the control group contracted the disease at a normal rate.
IS THERE SUCH A STUDY?
Since there’s been a vast reduction in the various diseases that are vaccinated for, what would you say has caused the reduction?
The sort of study you want would be unethical as children cannot make the decision to not be vaccinated and risk the heath effects of contracting the disease.
But what would you know of ethics?
you cannot account for other reason/s for the reduction in "vaccinated for " diseases? you would do well living under kruschev, putin, castro, you would be a good comrade. The party welcomes you, for your lack of critical thinking… you follow the party lines completely.
What, pray tell, oh fucked of mind, would be those other reasons?
where the fk is the vaccine for cancer? for aids? for the common cold? what’s taking so long, junior? where are the vaccines that really make a difference?
There are hundreds of viruses that cause the common cold. Do you have any idea of the complexity of developing a new vaccine?
Do you know what AIDS means? A vaccine works through the immune system.
There are numerous causes of cancer, few(if any) of which are bacterial or viral in nature.
You can’t make a vaccine against, say, tobacco smoke or asbestos.
Oh, for fuck’s sake…LARRY! You’re a nutcase. Get help.
Because the benefits of vaccines are well understood, and it would be unethical for doctors to expose the control population to a higher risk of getting the diseases.
And it isn’t necessary. When I was in kindergarten I got one of the first Salk polio vaccines. Before this time my mother and others of her generation lived in fear of polio outbreaks. Afterwards, no fear. Care to explain that?
Oh please, communist based insults is so 1918. Get up to speed with 21st century fear mongering and call us terrorists or something.