Anti-vaxxers are ignorant scumbags that kill children

So will everything modern medicine does to save millions of them.

The arguments against vaccination are nonsense. The arguments against vaccinating a baby with fifteen things in a single day may be extremely weak, but they are IMHO stronger than the arguments that simply serve convenience.

Only that it has not been found among human vaccines that have much more scrutiny than the ones given to dogs, and that antivaxxer point about dogs sounds a lot like a urban rumor.

Oh, I can not think of a reason you missed post #51, There are reasons why even on that point the antivaxxers are morons.

And there are other reasons why the antivaxxers do like to push this item; because they have lost the argument in all other related issues, and they do know that many times people forget about getting the shots later or they do not have enough money to pay for the alternate schedules they are advised to follow by the antivaxxers.

My current breeder lost pups in litters of recent years from overvaccination; she’s a qualified vet and no longer allows her pups to be mass vaccinated. It’s been no trouble to take my boy to his favorite vet here three times instead of once. I’m willing to sacrifice a tad of convenience for his possible benefit.

Not liking an argument because a group of shitheads uses it doesn’t invalidate it. The only - ONLY - reason for mass vaccination is convenience, as defined by insurance companies and HMOs. Maybe there are vanishingly few problems with mass vax; there are fewer with spreading them out over a short time. It doesn’t mean I stand with the flat-earthers or am giving them aid and comfort by saying so.

That seems to be common. Once you believe one wacko conspiracy the rest seem to follow, they all fall in place, and the good knowledge gets crowded out.

Earlier this year, our local community hospital – the one that does modern surgeries, has a modern emergency room, and appears to be mainstream science – held a free workshop on Tuesday nights for six weeks in two locations. Was this an opportunity for the public to learn useful anatomy, medicine, biology, chemistry or anthropology?

Not in the slightest. It was entitled, “Mind, Body & Spirit, Integrated Medicine Holistic Workshops.” The curriculum was Acupressure, Critical Alignment Yoga Therapy, Aromatherapy, “Eating Live Foods,” Art Therapy, and Integrative Biological Dentistry. That’s the complete list.

Not a speck of medicine in there anywhere.

Maybe I’m expecting too much from a hospital that is supported by the Catholic Church. Mysticism is in its blood, so to speak.

Mankind is full of irrational fears. I used to be afraid of the scary monster under my bed or that God would punish me for taking an extra candy bar. Most of us grow out of these beliefs. Some people never do.

The death of a few kids because they, or the other kids around them, weren’t vaccinated at the earliest possible opportunity is a problem with spreading out vaccination. And if there’s a medical reason for spreading them out in a few cases, it’s important that those kids are protected by everyone else being vaccinated.

Do you understand risk / reward? If the recommended schedule kills 1 in 1 million from rare vaccine side effects thats still much much much better than no vaccines at all. And it’s also better than the 10 in 1 million that might result from a delayed schedule.

You keep saying that. Why do you keep saying that.

Reasons for mass vaccination:

  1. Fewer unvaccinated kids diluting the herd immunity
  2. Less opportunity for the kid getting vaccinate to get the disease
  3. Fewer seizures
  4. Increased vaccination rates
  5. Convenience
  6. Lower cost for the parent, the physician’s office and for insurance
  7. Shorter wait times at the pediatrician’s.
  8. Fewer trips to the pediatrician’s.

You can argue that 1 and 2 don’t increase risk to a statistically significant degree, but seeing as some parents are stretching out the schedule over 6 years (sometimes letting them go completely unvaccinated until right before kindergarten), I would ask for a hell of a lot of data to support that argument.

You can say that 5, 6, 7 and 8 aren’t worth risking children’s health for, and I’ll mostly agree, except to point out that every additional trip to the pediatrician’s office comes with a free hour of exposure to every germ being sneezed and coughed into the air of the waiting room and drooled onto the chairs. Disgusting filthy places, waiting rooms.

But 3? C’mon, that’s a real thing. A real physical effect that a delayed vaccination schedule can have. Seizures are no damn fun. They’ll rarely fatal, but imagine you’ve got a parent who is vaccine hesitant enough to create their own schedule. Now the delayed MMR causes a seizure. What chances do you think you have now of getting them to continue the rest of the vaccinations? None, that’s what you’ve got. You had your chance, and you blew it, and that kid is never getting another vaccine again.

Number 4 isn’t to be underestimated, either. Too often, “we’ll do it next time,” turns into “we never did it.” That’s true of dieting, of exercise, of cleaning out the garage, and of vaccination.

Read the rest of my post, in which I go to some length explaining just how many germs kids are exposed to every fucking day, and how it happens. All a vaccination is is exposure to one specific microbe.

Oh, like a typical dog breeder knows any more about medicine than Jenny McCarthy. And we are talking about animals that stick their noses into each other’s butts, seemingly to no ill effect.

The convenience is also for the parents, who don’t have to make the time for eight or ten different doctor appointments. And it really is a “can’t hurt, might avoid even rare complications” sort of move to do them in combination.

I am dissapoint. No one is going to comment on my very harsh crtitiuque of the US for the blowback on vaccination by the methods used of the Osama Bin Laden raid. Sorry this is not something you can just ignore ith as a very serious price, eg taking 20 years more to eliminate Polio from the Planet.

Or a dozen, in some vax sessions.

If kids are so exposed all the time, I guess they don’t need vaxes, then, right? They’re just sniffing all the antibodies they need out of each others’ butts.

And yeah, I do rank the opinion of a DVM from Davis with an Sc.D. (I think) in immunology from Stanford who works in research and happens to raise dogs as a hobby pretty highly. Especially for one of her pups.

But I’ll leave you to the froth. Mrs. B. needs some help with a presentation for the doctoral seminar that’s capping off her 25+ years in autism therapy development.

Read it again, nothing what you report is based on research, only anecdote; and it does not deny the other point: human vaccines have been tested already, applying what is happening to dogs to humans is just anti vaccination pap.

Of course it is not my problem that you show to all that you can not check links or read cites. Claiming that that is the ONLY reason shows only that you are just going into lala land and woo woo circles.

I spend a fair amount of time on a board with a lot of anti-vaxxers. There is no argument you can make that they don’t have a an answer for. An answer that’s wrong or illogical but that they’ll cling to with a tenacity that is truly impressive.

They believe virtually every diagnosis a child ever gets is a vaccine injury…it goes way beyond autism. Autoimmune problem? Vax injury. ADHD? Vax injury. Processing disorder? Vax injury. Speech delay? Vax injury. Motor skill issue? Vax injury. Chronic ear infections? Vax injury. Fell down and broke your arm? Vax injury (not kidding). They even have the mysterious “their eyes just look DULL” vax injury that I’ve certainly never noticed in my kids or any of their friends.

They believe that vaccines don’t prevent disease, those diseases were going away anyway due to clean water and sanitation. Don’t bother pointing out that some of these diseases were prevalent long after those developments, and that those same diseases are being eradicated in places that don’t have reliably clean water and sanitation. They’ll handwave those facts away.

They believe that herd immunity through vaccines is a myth and that herd immunity develops only with “true” immunity that people get through having the disease. Don’t try to argue that herd immunity is kinda worthless if everyone has to have the disease first in order for it to exist…they think disease-induced immunity is far superior for mysterious reasons.

They believe that the smallest, worst-designed, least-robust studies are superior to all others if they show any kind of correlation between vaccines and a health problem, forget about asking about causation…that hasn’t been found because no one wants to find it, and the drug companies smooth over and sidestep any data that doesn’t show that vaccines are 100% safe. Don’t bother arguing that if something’s not statistically significant, then it’s not and that studies don’t look at individual cases for a reason.

Seriously, there is nothing…nothing that will convince these people. And it’s difficult because many of them have their own observational data that tells them that their child was injured by a vaccine, so if you argue that it’s likely not the case you just look like an unsympathetic asshole. It’s an issue that thanks to Mr. Wakefield will always be with us.

Missing the point idiotically.

It is an idiot argument here because the point about the capability of the human immunological system was made to counter the idiot argument that humans can not deal with multiple inoculations. Unfortunately the bugs that we can get in epidemics are not available in controlled or inert dosages around us to make our own vaccines.

Again, unless you do think that dogs have the same immunology system as humans your point is idiotic to use for human vaccines that have been tested already many times and used too millions of times with virtually no effects as the ones the Vets you point at claim it is happening among dogs.

As long as she is not letting you apply your apples to the oranges she is presenting she will be fine.

Make sure to feed your kids a balanced diet to keep their noses wet and coats glossy :smack:

I wonder what causes otherwise educated people to believe in this rot. In Canada, my country, a fellow who operates a natural food store let his kid die of meningitis rather than take him to a hospital. They would rather use natural remedies:

By the time they took the child to a hospital, it was too late, he didn’t make it.

Here’s a link: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/jury-trial-truehope-toddler-dies-trial-underway-1.3479460

In South Africa, there’s a wide AIDS-denying movement. They’re not saying being poor puts you at risk of AIDS, they’re saying poverty causes AIDS. Unfortunately, presidents after Nelson Mandela believed in this nonsense too, including the current president, Jacob Zuma.

Zuma, when the health minister, allegedly raped an HIV-positive woman (he knew she was HIV-positive, and claimed it was consensual), a serious crime by itself, then delivered some “health advice”:

He was found not guilty, and didn’t die an ironic death. (Luckily for him, the transmission rate isn’t 100%, but the shower did nothing to reduce the risk.)

Link: Jacob Zuma rape trial - Wikipedia

There was another thread a few weeks ago about taking children away from unskilled parents. I wish this had been mentioned in that thread.

My point is simple: I can’t think of any situation where acting for the convenience of the institution produces a better situation for the consumer or individual. Vaccines are not special snowflakes in this regard, and I’m going to remain suspicious any time we’re asked to do something that just happens to be (1) massively profitable or (2) exceptionally convenient for those making the demand.

If you want to think I’m somehow a Jenny McCarthy fan because of that, fine. Great tits.

I don’t understand. They’d make more money if they only let you get one vaccine at a time, and you needed to pay a visit fee and administration fee each time.

How do they make more money doing several vaccinations at one visit?

Again, telling all that you are not looking at the links provided is not a way to convince others, you only show to all that 1) you can not reply to the evidence presented and 2) you are looking more like an idiot for not taking into account what was presented before, this is because this was linked already too and clearly willfully ignored by you as you have demonstrated:

Bottom line: when you continue to tell us after that that you can not think of “any situation” were the vaccines are given not just because of the convenience of the institutions you are indeed only depending on woo woo sources; and no, the vets that you are using as a source for this is an attempt at comparing apples and oranges. Simply an stupid point.

In the magic space of his empty fucking head, all things are possible.