I have a mole on my leg that’s been there as long as I can remember; I keep forgetting to ask my mother, but I’m assuming I was born with it. A little bigger than a pencil eraser and dark brown.
I think I ran into it at work a couple of weeks ago and bruised it, and since then I have become rather fixated on it, to the point that I went to my general practitioner MD and asked him about it; he said he sees no reason for concern at all, that it’s a “Hutchison’s Freckle” or something like that and to consider it a “beauty mark.” He told me to keep an eye on it, of course (I am a 26-year-old very fair strawberry blonde and my mother had a precancerous mole removed last year) but he basically said I’m worrying for no reason. (I stay out of the sun and haven’t worn shorts in years.)
However, he also knows I don’t have medical insurance and he said it would be “several hundred dollars” for me to get removed and he doesn’t see the point of that. Which makes me wonder if he would have told me to get it removed and biopsied if I did have insurance, just to be safe.
So I have a couple of questions for anybody who might know…about how much money are we talking here? He said they make a shallow incision that would require a couple of stitches, after they shoot up the area with anesthetic. I’m not (overly) concerned with the pain factor, but I’ll admit to being curious, although it’s mainly a money issue.
And can you always just look at a mole and know there’s a problem, or are there moles that have nothing apparently wrong with them that might still be dangerous? Should I just suck it up and spend the money anyway, just to be safe? I feel paranoid but on the other hand…I’m feeling paranoid.
If anybody could shed some light on any of this, I’d be grateful.
And I thought about posting this in General Questions but since I’m asking for personal experience/input I figured it belonged here. If it should go somewhere else, mods, please feel free.