**
Don’t blame me if you choose to use it in a way most people do not. Just like most people don’t consider debate to be a sport.
**
Fascinating…we’ve gone from me being “blinded by rage” to just having an “irrational hatred” - all without an apology or acknowledgement of wrongdoing. Sigh. Let’s pull out old Mr. Dictionary again…
**
It all goes together. Your irrational hatred has caused you to become blinded by rage. But what the hell, maybe I’m wrong.
[QUOTE]
[URL=“http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=irrational”]
OK…so in general, let’s talk right down to Earth, in a language that everyone here can easily understand.
**
1a. I was tortured, beaten, kicked, hit, taunted, teased, had my property stolen, broken, etc. by jocks in my High School. Many things which would have been crimes punishable by jail time - if one could report them without risk of retaliation and possible death. My dislike, if I had such a thing, thus has reason behind it.
**
Your dislike of all jocks is not rational. But then you’re defining jocks as someone who acts with to much machismo not just someone in athletics. Therefore a jock to you could be some guy not connected to any sport. But you’ve never made any effort in the past to seperate jocks from sports. “I was tortured, beaten, kicked, hit, taunted, teased, had my property stolen, broken, etc. by mexicans in my high school. My dislike, if I had such a thing, thus has a reason behind it.” You may have a reason to dislike jocks and organized sports but that doesn’t make it rational.
**
1b. I don’t know - are my arguments here showing more, or less clarity than normal? Or are they simply “not clear” because they are an opposing viewpoint to yours?
**
Perhaps you’re perfectly clear. There were others here who disliked “jocks” and sports that I did not feel had any irrational hatred in spite of the fact that I thought they were wrong. So perhaps it is simply something I’ve attributed to you in specific.
**
1c. I put forth the same evidence as 1a for this. Is my dislike, should I have one, unreasonable? No, it is not.
**
Your dislike of jocks is irrational though understandable.
**
Are you really trying to say that I have shown a hatred of jocks (my definition above) in past threads, or are you just trying to paint me with a broad brush of “irrationality” now?
**
Your definition? No. But since most people relate jocks to some sport I don’t think I was way off base. You’ve certainly not said anything in the past that would suggest you didn’t fit jocks in with those involved in organized sports. If you did then I must have missed it. How many jocks bothered you in high school who weren’t in team sports? I’ve never heard you mention them before.
**
I don’t think I understand how it is logical for you to continue to do this. I think you need to be careful - you really are coming across as a pretty arrogant person, who is not very nice IRL.
**
You know to be honest with you sometimes I worry about seeming to arrogant, not a nice person, or someone who just doesn’t care. But I’ve gotta call things how I see them. And no I don’t think you’re some evil wicked witch of the west.
**
Your words might be justified if I had said something inflammatory like “jocks must die! Jocks suck!” But rather, I have been most polite in general on this topic, and trying hard not to denigrate your opinions, or call you names or imply you are mentally unstable. Tell me - why are you doing these things? **
You didn’t use words like “jocks must die” because you’re not an asshole. What names have I called you? When did I imply that you were mentally unstable? We’ve all got irrational feelings at one point or another but that doesn’t make us mentally unstable.
Marc