UK MP is suspended for using the term “nigger in the woodpile.” I live in rural South Carolina and have never once heard the phrase. It is notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry, though, and I see from the wiki that the phrase has escaped from a British Lord. before this instance and even shows up in one of Dr. Seuss’s less commendable artworks.
So does this phrase still have life in some corners of the US and the UK?
I’ve worked for (quite elderly) bosses who used it - and got away with it because everyone somehow accepts the bad behaviour of older people (maybe in the knowledge that the problem will go away when they do)
I can’t remember the last time I heard the phrase, so it’s been decades at least. And I’m pretty sure the person I heard using it was quite elderly at the time.
I am familiar with that phrase in two different context. As an American I heard it as a way of saying: That person has some black ancestry from way back when.
But in the early 90s, I was traveling to England a lot, and would work with my British counterparts in putting together presentations for the work we were doing. At one point, we were discussing some fairly complicated procedures, and one of the Brits made a comment about “a nigger in the woodpile”. Needless to say, I almost fell out of my chair as this was a meeting with a bunch of people (I was the only American, though). Later, it was explained to me that it meant there was something “not right” about it. Too complicated, or very ef’ed up. BTW, this person was not old (although he might be now). I’m thinking he was in his 30s at the time, as was I.
I am familiar with the phrase* (I grew up in London in the 70s). I would only have associated it with clueless old people or perhaps equally clueless members of the upper classes. It is astonishing that such cluelessness is alive and well in 2017. And perhaps no coincidence that the phrase was uttered within the confines of the equally anachronistic East India Club.
*ETA: not in the “black ancestry” sense, but in the “concealed serious problem” sense.
I’m familiar with the term, in the sense of, “That person’s ancestry is not 100% white,” but never in a real world situation. I’ve seen it in fiction, usually as a marker that the speaker is not a good guy.
Yes, I’m familiar with it. Yes, I’ve heard people actually say it, though nearly always eliding the slur in favor of a not-very-euphemistic replacement.
I can’t remember ever hearing it. But after reading the thread (and understanding the term’s meaning), I’m sure someone, somewhere in my past has uttered that phrase.
I’m not going to any great length to defend it, but that frame is taken out of context. If you read the entire panel it makes more sense in a “sign of the times” scenario.
I’ve only heard it in the context of adultery. When I broke up with my ex I guess he thought I’d been unfaithful and he talked to my dad about it. My dad asked me “Is there a (not going to write it) in the woodpile?” and I knew that he was referring to “is there another man you’re sneaking around with.” This was also nearly 24 years ago when such phrases were not as frowned upon.
Now that I think about it, might the two meaning actually be the same? Saying that someone might have some black ancestry was/is akin to saying there was/is something fishy about his background. It’s just a little more explicit since one is conjecturing about an actual… black person. As the saying goes, from the wikipedia entry “some fact of considerable importance that is not disclosed”.
If that is the case, I suspect the ancestry meaning came first, and then became more generalized to mean anything that didn’t seem quite “right”.
I have only ever hear it in reference to literal suspect ancestry.
Of note, I have a caucasian relative with a causacian husband who gave birth to a mixed race child. Yes, the term was cheerfully bandied about by the family members because it so closely resembled the actual situation. This was in the early 1970s.
It’s hard to see the initial connection between woodpile and ancestry. It seems more likely to me that the more generalized sense of “undisclosed problem” came first, in an era when nobody would have thought twice about the racist metaphor of a bad thing (escaped slave?) hidden in an everyday object; and that the more specific meaning arose later, through taking the original metaphor too literally.