This appears to be a not-so-stealthy attempt to defend the governor who dressed in blackface at a medical school in the 1980s and was so proud of it he published it in the yearbook. These are not equivalent.
You were part of an anti-communist organization during the time when being anti-communist was common. You repudiated it at the same time everyone else did. Huge swaths of people can see themselves in you. We know what it’s like to be caught up in the zeitgeist of the day. I remember calling people “gay” and “retarded” back in the 1990s. But everyone remembers doing that at the time, so all I’d have to say is “Yeah, I used to think that was okay, but now I don’t.”
But this guy dressed in blackface in the 1980s, 30-50 years since that had been remotely acceptable by anyone in the United States. These were grad student age people, not youngsters. The guy’s nickname as “Coonman.” It is rare that any American finds any of this relatable, as something that a decent person could have done.
He had not repudiated this and move on before. And now he is refusing to try and make penance by dropping out and going and doing stuff to make amends for his transgression that he had not yet done. He’s trying to pretend that it is no big deal. He is showing he puts himself above the party since having the blackface governor is a problem for the Dems. Putting yourself above the party is (in this case, at least) putting yourself above the country.
Before a proper apology and attempt to make amends could have saved him. But he didn’t do it. And now he’s trying to undo admitting that the pic was of him, and then relating a story of other blackface as if this would help. (No, it is arguably not as bad, but it’s not a defense at this point.)
We understand forgiveness just fine. Forgiveness is not automatic. It is granted when the person has shown it to be appropriate. This governor has not, but shown it to be inappropriate. Deciding whether or not we thought the blackface was disqualifying is something that should have happened during the election.
As you say, the people you would supposedly run for would probably not care about the JWS, because it’s not relevant to their issues, and because it’s a common thing that most people have repudiated. The point is, the people always get the chance to choose, and you don’t get to shame them for deciding that someone hasn’t sufficiently made amends or repudiated their past.