NAF1138
April 25, 2009, 3:42pm
1161
Meeko:
Incidentally. I think I hit on something with 16, gang.
I mean, you know, if I didn’t, ChrisK would have allowed it to go through.
Meeko, you know of the fundamental contradiction between rules 4 and rule 2. You know that one of those rules MUST be true. You also know that Rule 17 is true. Therefor rule 16 must cancel rule 4 since no other rule does.
Still working with Chrisk on the Auction.
Yeesh.
I can’t even begin to explain what is wrong with this statement.
NAF1138
April 25, 2009, 3:47pm
1163
???
What have you seen that I haven’t friend?
Meeko:
Hrm.
So, offically, Mahaloth, you are declining my answer.
Thats how I make out what just took place.
Ccorrect?
Did you ask a 2nd question? I openly, in green, accepted the first question(and your Nickel) and was shut down by the Mod.
Why do you think I declined your question?
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 3:51pm
1165
Mahaloth:
Did you ask a 2nd question? I openly, in green, accepted the first question(and your Nickel) and was shut down by the Mod.
Why do you think I declined your question?
Mahaloth::
Chris shut you down. Therefore, like it or not, you have to offically reject the offer. Right?
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 3:52pm
1166
Naf:
Frankly, I’m not sure if our leading set of assumptions on a MAJORITY of the rules can hold true for next to all of them.
That is, I’m not as conviced as I once was on our (individual) deductions.
Why? Why must I decline it and you don’t have to officially withdraw the offer?
And why does it matter? I openly accepted it before Chris rejected it, so you know I was going to answer it.
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 3:54pm
1168
NAF: I’m not sure 16 is what we think it is.
I have a Hole in my rule set, that I don’t feel comfortable plugging up, as I once had.
NAF1138
April 25, 2009, 3:54pm
1169
Meeko:
Naf:
Frankly, I’m not sure if our leading set of assumptions on a MAJORITY of the rules can hold true for next to all of them.
That is, I’m not as conviced as I once was on our (individual) deductions.
Fair point, but I have seen every rule but 7 and 16. Frankly there are only so many things that are possible at this point.
ETA: you guys are silly.
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 3:55pm
1170
Mahaloth: Get ChrisK to explain it to you.
ChrisK saw what I was doing with the question. It was a bargain for a nickel.
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 3:56pm
1171
I wonder if 16 has us saying Hi to Opals.
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 3:58pm
1172
phi2dao, let’s get you back in this.
Meeko AB-2.75
Phi:
Ownership of my 4, 8, and 10 for your Silver Dollar.
Meeko AB-3.75
Phi
Ownership of BOTH my 9s for 2 quarters.
OK. So.
**I am officially rejecting Meeko’s question offer, but only after accepting it and having it canceled by the moderator of the game. **
Try again, Meeko? I totally am open to just about any question ChrisK will allow.
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 4:00pm
1174
That’s the problem here Mahaloth.
My question is going to be complex, if I ask another question.
I don’t think Chris will allow any complex question at all.
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 4:02pm
1175
NAF: I am making an assumption on 6. I haven’t seen 6 yet.
Meeko:
That’s the problem here Mahaloth.
My question is going to be complex, if I ask another question.
I don’t think Chris will allow any complex question at all.
Couldn’t you learn a lot by asking a simple question? Why bother asking a loaded question?
Actually, a loaded question(like the one you gave) would have only produced a complex and less useful response from me. You would learn more from a simple, confidential question.
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 4:03pm
1177
Phi, have you seen my 2.75 and 3.75?
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 4:06pm
1178
Mahaloth : I know the question you want me to ask.
I’m not paying anything to ask THAT question.
Meeko
April 25, 2009, 4:08pm
1179
Meeko AB 7
NAF:
Looks at all of my rules for one question on rules 3 and 6
Wow. I have no idea what you think I want you to ask.
I’m not kidding or lying.