Sure. A girl has a condition such as endometriosis that might be managed with birth control pills (nb: not a doctor). A progressive is like, “Okay, hon, let’s get you prescribed with birth control pills, but we’ve talked about sex, and this doesn’t mean it’s a good idea for you to have sex, right?” A conservative is like, “NO DAUGHTER OF MINE WILL TAKE BIRTH CONTROL PILLS AT 13, MY DAUGHTER ISN’T A HUSSY.”
I was going to list multiple scenarios, but I’m having trouble thinking of any other scenario where it’s more than vanishingly unlikely that a progressive is going to buy their child birth control.
I notice also that you’ve completely ignored the difference in approaches to birth control that I outline above, in favor of a scare tactic. This isn’t a great approach to discussion.
I don’t understand this conversation at all. We’ve gone off the rails.
I do know Claudia Conway was raised by Republican parents, so it seems like using her as a cautionary tale of the dangers of progressive parenting is misguided.
I preferred to just be open and honest with my kids. And told them to never fear coming to me when and if they needed any help with birth control. As a consequence, yes, my daughter, a high school senior, has been on birth control for a long time. And she has no fears of recrimination coming to me about any issues, regarding sex or ANYTHING else.
As a result, she’s happy, excelling in school, well-adjusted thus far, and has not had her long-term goal (of being a medical examiner) disrupted in any way, like so many other young females have.
Do you believe that actions count when you are teaching your children, or are words enough?
Do you believe that setting a good example is a useful tool in the child-raising playbook? Is it strictly a family things, or do you believe that when our friends, neighbors and leaders exhibit good moral character that our children are more likely to grow up with those same values?
If so — do you believe that marital commitment, sexual morality, honesty, candor, kindness, empathy, generosity, compassion and humility are desirable moral traits? If you do, how do you feel about the moral example that Donald Trump is setting for your children?
Let say maybe you don’t. Maybe you are a believer in “every man for himself” . Maybe you think your own moral codes are strong enough that you don’t care if your own leaders have no decency. But if that’s the case, why don’t you care what anyone outside the circle of “you and yours” does?
Ok, first conflating Trump et al to conservatism isn’t a great thing to do (nor would I as a conservative relate to anything Trump does as a morally sound thing to teach my kids)
If you are going to use Trump as the beacon of conservatism, do I get to use the progressive version of Trump to use as the shining example of progressivism? Hell, maybe I have been using that in my mind.
But to my mind, 13 year olds have no business being sexually active, they are simply not ready for that type of responsibility.
I (mostly) agree. I cannot imagine a circumstance under which a 13-year-old who’s engaged in sexual activity that requires contraceptives is engaged in healthy behavior. And I don’t think there are very many progressives at all who’d disagree with me.
I qualified what you said slightly, however, because I remember at that age having peers who were starting to have boyfriends or girlfriends and who were starting to experiment with stuff mildly beyond kissing. I’m not convinced that any sort of experimentation is developmentally inappropriate.
You do realize that the Republican Party, which is the official bastion of conservatism, installed him as the leader of the free world and have publicly stated that they give his agenda their full support?
He’s the President of The United States. On the day when we elect “a progressive version of Trump” to the highest office in the land, you can play your little “both sides” game. But not before then. You made your bed, now lie in it.
And I agree that 13 year olds should not be having sex. That why I’m glad I’m living in 2020 and not back in the days when America was GREAT. because in 1970, my emotional disturbed 13 year old sister had sex with several adult men, who took her across state lines. She was missing for 3 months. We knew who they were and what had happened and my parents tried and tried and could never get anyone to prosecute those men. Because she went willingly. The official response was that they were bad parents and she was a slut.
I know you’re gonna believe what you’re gonna believe, but do yourself a favor and don’t send them money because the entire conservative movement really is nothing but a scam, dude.
It’s probably easier for you to believe that an outfit called Right Wing News is running a liberal hit piece than it is to admit you’ve been had. But I tried.
I have some serious doubts about the Republicans being conservative. Yes, he is the leader of the Republican party, he is not the leader of conservatives.
I suspect it’s a misunderstanding of cases in which hormonal birth control pills are prescribed to young teenagers to treat another medical problem (endometriosis, severe acne, severe menstrual cramps, etc.) My girlfriend in high school suffered from undiagnosed endometriosis, and about 3 days of each month was in debilitating agony. She didn’t know the cause, but she knew that birth control pills were a common treatment for her sort of severe pain. However, her parents were religious conservatives who would never even consider letting her be on pills. When she moved out at 18 and got a diagnosis and access to the pill, it changed her life.
So when I think of conservatives furious about 13-year-olds getting on birth control, I have to wonder if they’re misunderstanding a situation in which it’s used to treat a teenager. I think about her–still a good friend–and it’s a little bit maddening.
Since we’re off on the sex education tangent, I’ll point out that there is little evidence that abstinence-based sex education programs decrease the rate or age of onset of sexual activity in teens compared to comprehensive sex education, and a fair amount to show that it doesn’t. In fact, quite the opposite seems to be true:
Bolding mine.
Lots of teens are going to have sex whether we want them to or not. Arming them with information about the potential consequences of doing so - and how to mitigate them - is a lot better than deliberately keeping them ignorant and pretending that this will somehow prevent them from having sex (which, when they have it, will be without that full understanding).
My daughter is getting to be “that age”, and while we will very strongly be pushing the message that she should wait until she’s older to have sex, we’re also going to make sure she is properly prepared for when she does. That’s a lot more respectful and responsible - and more likely to ensure that she waits until she’s mature enough - than simply saying “No” over and over.
In other topics: has Claudia Conway actually filed anything yet? I’m not seeing anything.