Now as an Englishman and a meat-eater both I take exception to this. But is there any scientific validity to it? Have any studies been done? Must I really forego that juicy steak if I want to be a better and kinder human being?
The author of this article clearly has a bone to pick, but offers some pretty convincing primary source evidence that Hitler’s vegetarianism was mostly a propaganda effort by Goebbels, and that Hitler ate a ton of sausage, ham, and liver dumpling.
I didn’t see any convincing primary source evidence. And there is no timeline. The article doesn’t really advance the issue in any direction.
It does contain some bad history. The author claims that Hitler banned vegetarian groups. The Nazi regime banned those groups. If the author believes that Hitler knew or ordered the bannings he doesn’t provide any evidence. Hitler had far bigger fish to fry.
Don’t know about the rest of you, but I get pretty mean if I don’t get my animal proteins on a pretty regular basis. So in a way, perhaps the OP premise is true.
Do you know how many thousands of years of breeding it took to domesticate animals and a bull will still kill you if you’re not careful. That’s why Buffalo in Yellowstone are the most dangerous animal.
Konrad Lorenz found that animals that kill to eat treated pack members and young far more kindly than animals that did not. His example was the highly structured society of wolf packs, which protect the young and train them and almost never have fatal conflicts, with pigeons and deer, which will kill other members of the group for little or no reason.