Okay, it’s early in the season, but the Royals have a chance at immortality; they are a historically awful bunch of bums. Consider:
1. They stink.
At their current pace the Royals would finish the season 36-126, which would be the most losses by any team ever and would be the worst winning percentage in modern baseball history:
2006 Royals extrapolated: 36-126 .222
1916 Athletics 36-117 .235
1935 Braves 38-115 .248
1962 Mets 40-120 .250
1904 Senators 38-113 .252
1919 Athletics 36-104 .257
203 Tigers 43-119 .265
1952 Pirates 42-112 .273
2. No, they REALLY stink.
Weird W-L records are often just really, really flukey, but the Royals really are pretty awful. So far this year they have 170 runs scored against 286 allowed. The Pythagorean method suggests that a team with that ratio of runs scored to allowed would have a winning percentage of just .260. So they might be unlucky so far by just one or two games.
The Royals’ offense, with those 170 runs scored, is not just the worst in the American League, but is the worst by a really wide margin - they’re 10% worse than the SECOND-worst team, and are at the bottom is any offensive category you care to name. The pitching is just as bad.
3. And they’ve stunk for awhile now.
For a team to be truly abysmal, they can’t just have one catastrophic season. They must have a catastrophic season amidst a series of merely disastrous seasons. The Royals definitely meet this requirement of suckosity. In 2004, they had the worst season in team history, going 58-104. And then in 2005 they actually got a little worse, going 56-106. They’ve lost 100 games or more in three of the last four seasons, whereas in the previous 33 seasons of the team’s history they never lost 100 games. *All the rest of the teams in the major leagues * accounted for only 5 100-loss seasons in the four years that the Royals, by themselves, did it three times.
4. And they’re individually really terrible.
Even awful teams usually have at least one or two good players, maybe even All-Star calibre guys. The 1916 A’s got good years from Joe Bush and Amos Strunk. The 2003 Tigers had Dmitri Young hitting .297 with 29 homers. The 1935 Braves had Wally Berger lead the league in homers and RBI.
But the Royals have nobody good. The team’s “best” starter is - I guess - Scott Elarton, who’s 0-5 with a 4.71 ERA and has walked more men than he’s struck out. The only pitcher to pitch a significant number of innings and not stink is someone named Mike Wood, who, frighteningly, has also walked more men than he’s struck out, a sure sign that his luck will soon run out and he’ll start getting hammered. Elmer Dessens was pitching well for awhile but a few recent disasters have ballooned his ERA to 5.25.
The big off season acquisition was Joe Mays, who the Royals got based on a fluke season he had five years ago despite the fact that his arm is obviously blown out. Mays is 0-4, 10.27.
The lineup is no better. The team’s only really good hitter has been a rather flukey start by Esteban German in roughly half-time play. Mark Grudzeilanek has been okay. Must of the rest of the team has been excruciating. There are no potential All-Stars. The team’s leader in homers and RBI is Reggie Sanders, whose career as a good luck charm is, apparently, over.
So do you think this is the worst team ever?