Are You Buying An iPad?

OK, you can implicitly change my answer to “already bought one.” Although technically mine’s on order, it was my wife that bought one. Got it at 9:15 last night by walking into the Apple store and buying it; the entire transaction took about two minutes. The store was literally packed with people playing with them, purchasers were directed to a different route. (Note my location – due to a certain large business in the area, sales may not be typical).

Southern Yankee so far as I know, you can only browse from within iBooks, but I suspect this functionality will move to iTunes soon. Or you can use the free Kindle iPad app, which is what I do, since you can browse Amazon’s stock, share your books to Mac/PC/iPad/iPhone/Kindle/etc, and I’ve already got a kindle-format library. The reading experience of both seem pretty similar; there’s not much to differentiate the two at the moment.

Most apps store their location when I shut down, and start up at the same place when I launch. It’s not true multi-tasking, but accomplishes the same goal for most things. Music plays in the background, and most other things you’d want (chat and the like) can use the push notification if they want to fake it. I’m just not seeing the outrage, but then, I buy things for what they can do for me, not for what they can’t.

I haven’t actually launched the web browser on it yet, oddly.

Pages is an “OK” Word processor, much like Pages on the Mac. (Again, note my location: Microsoft Word is in the water supply here). They keyboard will take some getting used to – I don’t have problems writing notes on it, but I’d want a physical one for long documents. I rather doubt that many folks will use this for long document creation anyway; but it’s an idea editing/proofreading environment.

KeyNote, on the other hand, is practically the poster child for this thing; it’s far more intuitive than the desktop version (or PowerPoint, although the latter is much more powerful). At $10 each, it’s pretty hard to argue with either of them. I don’t use spreadsheets much in my daily life, so I haven’t bought Numbers.

Games are going to be unbelievable on this. I’ve run a few of my iPhone ones at 2x, and control is vastly easier (although the screen is blockier).

The killer apps for me at the moment are Kindle (if you’ve got the books) and Netflix – much better than the implementation on Tivo/XBox, etc, it’s much more like the computer implementation – you can view the entire streaming collection (rather than just the ones you’ve put onto an Instant Queue), and stream them immediately. It’s much better for reading/Movie viewing in bed than a laptop – lighter, doesn’t get warm, longer battery life, doesn’t interfere with a cat lying on you. It’s not as nice for reading as an actual Kindle, but doesn’t require the external light, either.

Fingerprints: Oleaphobic screen or not, this collects fingerprints like nobody’s business, even if I make a point to wash my hands before using it. This doesn’t matter when the screen is on – it’s plenty bright enough to make them invisible, but as soon as you turn it off you’ll feel a compulsion to clean it off (which is easy because of the screen coating).

It’s not just an oversized iPod Touch: the faster processor makes it more responsive, and the larger keyboard allows even us without teen thumb to write short-to-middle length documents comfortably (hint: lock the screen rotation before setting it down to type if you’re going to put it on a completely flat surface, so you don’t get betrayed by the accelerometer. It’s not a problem on your lap.) Nor is it a tablet PC – it’s instant-on for one thing, and Apple’s encouraging new intuitive UI metaphors for multi-touch that aren’t just translating a stylus location to a mouse click. It’s going to take a while for this to gel, though, and right now UI’s are a bit of a no-man’s land except for Apple’s apps and the baseline standards (tap, pinch, flick, rotate, scroll) they’ve set for everybody.

This won’t replace my desktop computer for anything, nor the laptop computer for real work, but for travelling, e-mail, media consumption, games, and reading, those full-size devices are toast. It’ll probably also replace my iPhone; the small screen seems astoundingly limiting after just a few minutes of using the iPad, so I’ll probably go to a cheap PPM cell and the 3G iPad (when it arrives) for the browsing stuff.

Last Notes: the built-in speakers on the iPad are surprisingly good, though not stereo. Charging over USB can be a challenge if your computer maker skimped on the power to the USB ports; even some of my powered hubs can’t charge it while it’s on (and slowly while it’s off). If you don’t have a Mac with built-in ports available, you may need to use the supplied charger if you need it charged in a hurry (it comes with a full charge).

No, you didn’t say anything about shit. Nor did I. You said, or implied, that it does nothing.
So, how’d you like that pretty iMac? It does a lot.

I have a genuine question. How do you operate and hold it at the same time?

It seems like no matter what you do - rest it on a table or your lap, put it on a stand, hold it in one hand - there’s all sorts of uncomfortable awkwardness you have to overcome.

What are you talking about? That’s the first time I’ve posted to this thread…

You’re right. I was referring to GuanoLad’s related post.
I don’t have to apologize, 'cause I’m old. Old trumps manners.

And I was exaggerating, because I’m young and reckless.

:cool:

You are wise, sir. I bought one because my wife was talking about a Kindle and I wanted to avoid a single-use device. I thought we’d share, but I can already see that it is ‘hers’ and I’ll rarely handle it. Back to my laptop, I guess.

I agree with your assessment of the iPad, with the few hours I’ve been able to use it, it is just as you report. An amazingly useful device.

It does not seem to be an issue. If you are typing, you need to rest it somewhere, just browsing or reading is no problem to hold it in one hand and use the other to scroll etc. Reading a book can be done with both hands and thumb taps to page forward and back.

I can only suggest that you go try it yourself or watch some of the tours at Apple.com.

Not really. As I said, there are currently 18 Android platforms. Motorola has the most but some are AT&T exclusives and have a lot of functionality removed (like the Motorola Backflip, which only runs Yahoo!-sourced apps).

Anyway, why would the Motorola Droid earn a higher score because of AT&T? The iPhone is also an AT&T exclusive for the time being, isn’t it?

I meant Verizon as the carrier. Droid scored higher than iPhone for call quality by quite a bit. The guy said this was because of iPhone’s carrier, AT&T.
BTW; he should know putting the two phones side-by-side to call one another means nothing.

Well, yeah, but it’s your citation. Anyway, every major US carrier except Metro PCS offers Android-based phones, including AT&T, so carrier/call quality would be a selling point for all of them, depending on who offers the best coverage in your specific area.

What’s wrong with single-use devices?

I use a Kindle and an iPod Touch; together they add up to less weight than the iPad, and less total cost too. And together they cover most of the functions of the iPad. The combination is more flexible than the iPad too - if I’m just listening to podcasts and music, I can just fit the iTouch in my shirt pocket.

Admittedly the iPad is probably better than either one for web browsing, and possibly for viewing other types of documents as well. It does have a higher resolution (and color) than the Kindle screen, which doesn’t matter for textual reading material, but does matter for viewing presentations and pre-formatted documents. Still, I’m not convinced the iPad would actually replace any of my current devices; if I were to buy one, I’d probably carry it in addition to the Kindle, not instead. (Especially because the Kindle has free wireless.)

Nothing, just personal preference.

Also, I wanted better web browsing than the Kindle provides. Free wireless didn’t matter, downloading books on WiFi just is not a problem for us - for iBooks and Kindle books. For book reading, it is heavier than the Kindle, but it weighs no more than the trade paperback it replaces.

Nothing. It just means the utility dollar value is lower. Clearly the sales figures justify it’s existence. And as an Apple single-use device it’s designed to generate cash from the Apple Store so it really doesn’t have to make a profit by itself.

God bless the Apple geeks who buy it because they are fronting the money for tomorrow’s utility purchases. When this spawns a full function 2 lb laptop with 320 GB of chip memory and a rotating touch screen I’m going to pry my wallet open.

The Fujitsu P1630 has been available for a while. It’s a full Windows-7 laptop with a Core-2 Duo processor. It has a rotating touch screen. It weighs 2.2-lb with the smaller battery, and can be fitted with a 128-GB solid state drive. Not close enough? (Admittedly it’s a bit expensive - about $3000 with these specs.)

I walked past the Apple Store today so I decided to go in and have a look at it, just to see how it is in real life. I thought it would at least be a cool device to play with, even if I think there’s no real use for it, but I’m even less impressed now than before. It’s heavier than I thought and the edges are sharper than those on the iPod Touch. There’s no way I’d want to hold that thing for hours to read a book or watch a movie.

I’ve been looking at them. The price is a little steep and I want a little bigger screen.

There’s also the viliv s10. It’s more of a netbook (Atom processor) but it has a 10-inch 1366x768 multitouch screen, and starts out at $700. This may be a better choice if you really want a “touchscreen” rather than stylus imput. (The Fujitsu’s screen doesn’t really respond to your fingertips; you need to use a stylus or fingernails.) Although I suspect the viliv uses a TN display. (The Fujitsu is either PVA or IPS.)

I voted “Apple User - I might later. We’ll see how it goes,” but I’d just like to chime in and say that for me, no Flash compatibility should be regarded as a feature, not a limitation. Every time I come across a website with its custom “loading” progress bar, the need for a “skip intro” button or custom navigation, I cringe. And I’m even a graphic designer who can appreciate this stuff from an interface design standpoint. But as someone that just wants the friggin’ content, it’s a huge annoyance.

http://www.skipintros.com/

[QUOTE=pricciar;12296734I think they look like awesome gadgets that would be fun to fiddle with while sitting on the couch watching tv.
[/QUOTE]

Isn’t it interesting that now-a-days people are so used to doing more than one thing at a time. I don’t mean this as a rap and I’m just as guilty of, I guess the term is multitasking, but what happened to the days when you could sit and watch TV and have it interest you enough not to have to fiddle with something :slight_smile: