Bill Maher famously said, if Trump supporters want the rest of us to stop calling them stupid, they’ll have to meet us half way.
billfish678 is here to prove, yet again, that we can expect no such co-operation from them.
Bill Maher famously said, if Trump supporters want the rest of us to stop calling them stupid, they’ll have to meet us half way.
billfish678 is here to prove, yet again, that we can expect no such co-operation from them.
Huh? Are you saying that because one industry (pro sports) appears to not be afflicted by racism any more, that means that every industry is unaffected by racism?
Sigh. Newsflash for you, iiandyiiii - the term “wetback” is not a racial slur. Never has been, never will be.
yes it is
Newsflash for you, Clot – Wetback (slur): Wetback (slur) - Wikipedia.
Alert: Your quota of stupid for the day has been exceeded.
It certainly is. One of the top five, probably.
What do you think of these activities:
That’s not how language works. Any word can become a slur, and any slur can stop being a slur, if its usage changes. Lots of people use “wetback” as a racial/ethnic slur, which makes it a slur.
Are you of the opinion that language is static and words never change in their usage?
Why are conservatives so keen on policing and repressing other people’s sexual behaviour?
Seriously. Whenever there’s moral outrage and vocal opposition to the sexual expression of consenting adults, at least in the USA, it’s from one of two sources: the moralistic authoritarian groupings to the Right, and/or the more puritanical, tyrannically inclined sectors of radical feminism (who are a whole 'nother can of copperheads, and in bed with the righteous right on this stuff anyway). Who made it those people’s affair?
Homosexuals have no worse enemies than the sex repressive and religious right–who seem to consider it something only straight married couples should be permitted to do. Conservatism is the side from which most propaganda for the valorization and enshrinement of heterosexual monogamy (proceded by chastity, virginity, celibacy, abstinence and “sexual moderation”) is spawned and disseminated. Organized attempts to censor pornography and art with strong sexual content, are nearly always spearheaded, bankrolled and energized by churchgoers and their ilk, who claim their authority over all our orgasms, in the names of Decency, Wholesomeness, Child Centered and Family Friendly Culture, and that kind of odious and biased construction.
Need I even mention the Bible babbling anti-abortion movement – a straight up attempt to punish sexually active women with pregnancy? T
This shit is propagated by both the ignorant prejudiced lower classes and their ideological and financial nurturers higher in the conservative heirarchies.
Basically, wherever authoritarian sexual mores are prevalent, you will find religious overseers and conservativity each holding up half the sky.
And let us not even venture into how the vocal right makes obnoxious and control-driven harsh judgements on whose sexual proclivities are labelled deviant, perverted or kinky. BDSM and other outre sexual realms are demonized and pathologized by conservatives to a degree that sanctimonious hypocrites ofn the left are only now catching up to.
Why does conservatism uphold the very worst human traits, ie self righteousness and bossiness? Why did they decide to make our vice their business? And where the Hell do you people get off?
Does Sarah Palin make your peepee hard?
Why are conservatives so keen on policing and repressing other people’s sexual behaviour?
Seriously. Whenever there’s moral outrage and vocal opposition to the sexual expression of consenting adults, at least in the USA, it’s from one of two sources: the moralistic authoritarian groupings to the Right, and/or the more puritanical, tyrannically inclined sectors of radical feminism (who are a whole 'nother can of copperheads, and in bed with the righteous right on this stuff anyway). Who made it those people’s concern?
Homosexuals have no worse enemies than the sex repressive and religious right–who seem to consider it something only straight married couples should be permitted to do. Conservatism is the side from which most propaganda for the valorization and enshrinement of heterosexual monogamy (proceded by chastity, virginity, celibacy, abstinence and “sexual moderation”) is spawned and disseminated. Organized attempts to censor pornography and art with strong sexual content, are nearly always spearheaded, bankrolled and energized by churchgoers and their ilk, who claim their authority over all our orgasms, in the names of Decency, Wholesomeness, a Child Centered Culture and that kind of odious and biased construction. Need I even mention the Bible babbling anti-abortion movement – a straight up attempt to punish sexually active women with pregnancy. This shit is propagated by both the ignorant prejudiced lower classes and their ideological and financial nurturers higher in the conservative heirarchies.
Basically, wherever authoritarian sexual mores are prevalent, you will find religious overseers and conservativity each holding up half the sky.
And let us not even venture into how the vocal right makes obnoxious and control-driven harsh judgements on those bwhose sexual proclivities are labelled deviant, perverted or kinky. BDSM and other outre sexual realms are demonized and pathologized by conservatives to a degree that sanctimonious hypocrites ofn the left are only now catching up to.
Why does conservatism uphold the very worst human traits, ie self righteousness and bossiness? Why did they decide to make our vice their business? And where the Hell do you people get off?
Are you talking to me?
Because if you were, that was pretty damned gratuitous.
It’s a message board. Multiple people respond on the topic, and not all of them are necessarily addressing you.
Are you a poe? I ask because if someone asked me to caricature the average republican voter as seen by liberals, it would look a lot like you. Nonsensical positions, no thought given to them, reveling in being an asshole, and an utter unwillingness to actually address unpleasant thoughts. This seems essentially too convenient, like a YEC who starts with arguments on AiG’s “Arguments you shouldn’t use” page and goes down the whole list.
And even Webster reports that it is offensive.
It is clear that Clothy has not received the Republican memo.
Of course, one can then assume that Clothy does dwell among buddies that tell him that Republicans are hunky dory about using offensive language. Clothy is just a good example of the kind of Republican the leadership does not mind to attract, until they are caught with a microphone that is…
It is a shame, and I agree. I have tried to sincerely engage these people and they cannot come up with a straight statement of principles. If I had time I would start a GD thread on what Republicans believe these days, because it is really not clear that they believe in anything more than “stick it to the libtards”. They clearly don’t give a shit about the deficit, the debt, or waste, fraud and abuse in government.
It is a slur here in Colorado and has been for decades.
Wow…someone saying that “wetback” is not a racist slur? WTF? Are we back in the 50’s? Oh yeah, MAGA!!!
I read through this shitshow and the OP is an even bigger idiotic douche than I already thought he was. That’s all.
I think I’d rather hear opinions from one or more people that Clothy considers “wetbacks” before I decide whether this is accurate.
Dang, come to think of it, about an hour ago I had a tree-trimming crew here, three of whom were Spanish-speaking. At the end of the job, I could have said, “all you wetbacks have a good day, hear” and seen how they reacted. Dang.