Yes I answered it. Of course you ignored the parentheticals. You somehow think your beliefs are some cosmic truth. I showed you I understand your ramblings quite well. Its not that deep. But your beliefs are silly. I felt silly just writing it. The fact that you don’t understand how silly your beliefs are is sad. The fact that you stated that I answered the question without indicating I believed none of it is nuts.
[QUOTE=Kozmik]
No.
[/Quote]
Why not? The Girls Scouts are an organization in which the members, structure and methods are all well documented and easily found. It fits your criteria for organizations which prove that the Illuminati can exist. But for some reason the Girl Scouts don’t count. It was your criteria, not mine.
Because like you have been doing for years, you leap from A to Z and miss all the steps in between. One point does not follow the other in any logical way. But you have your nose pushed into examples of your illogical and crazy thinking and you still somehow believe you are only going from A to B. Madness. Its how clinically insane people think and act.
Human interaction is chaotic. Inventing hierarcy to explain all aspects of human interactions is trying to find order in chaos. The chaos is reality. Lizard People are a fiction created to explain away the chaos. That is what you are doing. Reversing the order of the words make no sense and is just an attempt at a clever turn of phrase which fell flat. My standard is logic. I set the same standard for you and me. You are failing in every post.
When I said that “you believe the Illuminati exists because if all heads of government got together, that would be a G-192 meeting,” you responded with this:
Then you wrote:
So on this page, you say that since someone has to be in charge of the G-192 meeting, that would be the Illuminati; but on the previous page, you told me that the G-192 and the Illuminati were two separate beliefs.
I simply cannot understand why my statement is wrong and Loach and drewtwo99 are more or less correct when I think we all said more or less the same thing.
And I still don’t understand what there is to “believe” about this G-192. You’ve invested this hypothetical with some mystical and important quality that I don’t understand.
What does it mean to believe in the G-192 summit? Does it involve merely believing that such an could happen, believing that it has, believing that it happens regularly, or something else?
“Yes” is not a sensible response to this question.
No, the Illuminati would only be in charge of the G-192 meeting, the meeting where all heads of government are present.
It means the same as believing in the Illuminati. It involves believing that such could happen, the G-192 summit, the Illuminati.
As iiandyiiii wrote concerning the Illuminati:
The same could be written concerning the G-192 summit:
I don’t get it. The G8 is a meeting of equals, and somebody has to preside over it, but you say the presiding officer is not an Illuminati. The G-192 would be a meeting of equals, but an Illuminati would preside over it? That makes no sense to me. If the organizing principle is that someone of higher importance has to preside over meetings of equals, then why does the Illuminati only get called in at the G-192?
What happens if it was a G-191 meeting (because nobody wanted to invite the Vatican or whatever), would the Illuminati preside over that? What about a G-183 meeting?
Even if the G-192 summit happened, it would not need an outside entity to “preside” over it. It could have a rotating chairman, for example, or a secretary without authority who simply guides the meeting along.
You may have missed the earlier discussions of the G-192. Kozmik envisions this as not being at all similar to any other summit meeting – it must be secret, the only attendees are the heads of state themselves (no staff or support personnel), and as the only reason to hold the meeting is to allow the Illuminati Primus to speak to the assembled heads of state, clearly the only person who could call or chair the meeting is said Illuminatus.
He has given us absolutely no insight into why he believes this particular fantasy to be significant.
I may have mentioned that Kozmik’s grasp of international diplomacy and politics is demonstrably less than that displayed by Saturday-morning cartoons.
Because the G-192 summit is a meeting of all heads of government, a meeting of *all *equals.
Yes, in the event of the G-191 summit, which could happen next month (because of the resignation of the Pope), the Illuminati would preside over that. Keep in mind, there could be a G-191 if and only if there is no Pope, as there will be no Pope at the end of the month. It has to be a meeting of all equals and after this Thursday Benedict XVI will not be an equal.
There is no evidence, as far as I know, for the existence of the Illuminati; on the other hand, the G-192 summit, prima facie, would have evidence for its existence.
This particular fantasy involves the resignation of the Pope, which signals the opening of the G-192 - oops - G-191 summit (cheers!) which will be held during the vacancy of the Vaticancy.
I still don’t understand why a meeting of all countries requires the Illuminati to preside, but the Illuminati would have no interest or requirement to preside over a meeting of almost all countries. Please explain that to me.
ETA: What happens if every world leader is invited, but one, two, or a dozen world leaders decide they will not attend? Is that still a G-192?
Becuase the Illuminati only get to drink when the number 192 (bottoms up!) is mentioned, so what would be the point of holding a G-everybody meeting when there were fewer than 192 (skoal!) countries?
Excellent question. Let’s say that the G-192 summit were to be held from February 25 to March 11. On February 28, one of the attendees would have to recuse themself. Before February 28, it would be a meeting of all heads of government and after February 28 it would still be a meeting of all heads of government.
There would be no such summit if some world leaders decided not to attend. There would be such a summit, however, in the extraordinary event that the Pope resigns. Understand that it’s not important that all countries are represented, it’s important that all heads of countries are represented.
It’s not countries per se that matter - it’s heads of countries. So it’s not a meeting of all countries; more to the point, it’s a meeting of all heads of all countries.
To demonstrate what or who the heads of countries collectively represent. hint: it’s not countries (which they represent individually) but something or someone else.