I knew I should have included a link. Oh, wait, I did.
nm
This is fun, now I have a question for you.
Australia has an elected Prime Minister, an appointed Governor General and a hereditary Monarch.
Who do we send to the G192?
If we send our head of state she also happens to be the lizard queen of England, New Zealand etc.
Are the Illuminati aware of your expectations for them? Have you told any of their agents or representatives that they MUST have this G-192 meeting, and that you will not consider it legitimate unless they hold it exactly as you describe? Why should the Illuminati limit themselves to what you can envision?
Because he is an Illuminatus, possibly the Anarch.
That’s my take-away as well. How else would he be so informed about the necessary details of the G-192 meeting when no one else has ever even heard of it?
Good luck calling him out on it; all I got were emoticons. That villain.
Emoticons? Luxury!
I get links to Wikipedia pages which are (I presume) either intended to answer the question or explain why he is refusing to answer. I wish I had the wit to tell which it is.
Well, I am a hedonist at heart. Of course there’s no way a complete stranger on the internet could know that. Unless…
Excellent question. You are getting to the crux of the matter. See that’s the “secret”. Elizabeth II is Queen of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, ect. The Prime Minister of Australia would go to the summit. At the summit each country’s representative will take their seat. Once seated, Elizabeth II will make her entrance. Presumably, all the representatives will know who she is. Elizabeth II will give an introduction for the Anarch and the Anarch will make an appearance. The Anarch will only be known to Elizabeth II. None of the representatives will know who the Anarch is. The Anarch will conduct the meeting. The Anarch and Elizabeth II will disappear. The representatives will report back to their country, their government. The Anarch will report back to his or her superiors. Elizabeth II will be the “inside man” who will be the liaison, after the summit, between the representatives of the summit, the Illuminati, and the media. The ultimate conspiracy.
Well, I did envision the Pope resigning.
Holy shit. We’ve broken through to NutCon Level 5.
There’s an agenda now!
How do you know all this? It sounds like a bad Dan Brown novel.
What is the subject of the meeting? It sounds like the Anarch is going to make some kind of proposal to the assembly. Is it guaranteed that the world leaders will agree to it?
For a super-secret organization they are pretty lousy at keeping secrets.
This is now at the level of 4th grade recess chatter; I’m waiting for GI Joe and SMERSH to come into the picture.
Thats redundant. I think you mean a worse Dan Brown novel. If that is even possible.
I used reasoning as **Ravenman **did in this post.
It’s a secret. Obviously the subject would be of global importance. Of course, there is no guarantee that the world leaders will agree to it.
The big secret is like the big lie - no one will believe it.
When you were just spewing random non-sequitors and waving your hands it was generally amusing to watch you spin in ever smaller spirals. But once you start putting details to your rantings it becomes simply a sad parody of a street corner loony. You weave ridiculous tales with completely unsupported details that you clearly made up out of whole cloth.
You didn’t use reasoning; you used fantasy. Anyone could dream up a similar tale with logic or sense and it would have the same validity as your posts. We started with the question of whether you could get all the heads of state together in one room and you’ve concocted this erratic, illogical, and frankly unimaginative narrative about the Queen of England, the Pope, your imaginary Grand Poobah, oops, I mean Anarch, and several more layers of impenetrable gobbledygook.
The comparison to Dan Brown is dead on; poorly written narrative, bad logic, characters with no reasonable motivation, and plot holes you could drive the QEII through.
I don’t think I used any reasoning there.
But another question for you: you said Elizabeth II would introduce the Anarch. If she passes away or resigns, would the next head of the British monarchy then be responsible for introducing the Anarch? Or is there something special about Elizabeth II that would make her carry out this duty?
And, does this mean that Elizabeth II is aware of the Illuminati’s proposal, and that she approves of it?
Thank you for proving my point.
You are one of the few posters who is using any reasoning here.
Yes.
Yes.