Except for the unfortunate fact that:
A never happened
B is irrelevant
C is a physical impossibility
Why in the holy fuck would anyone cause a fucking hurricane to get Bloomberg to endorse Obama?? NYC and NY state was going to go to Obama even if he was on national television blowing little boys the night before the election. And no one outside of New York and few inside give a fuck what Bloomberg says. It makes no sense to anyone with half a brain.
That is of course ignoring the fact that you can’t point a hurricane like a gun.
So, **They **have moved from blackmail to weather control machines to influence elections? Have **They **become so weak that they need a sledgehammer where **They **once would have used a scalpel? This is totally unlike **Their **former strategies, where **They **would simply have a chambermaid cry Rape and let slip the dogs of the media.
If getting Obama re-elected was so crucial to **Their **plans, why wouldn’t **They **just manipulate the Republican primaries to nominate a candidate less likely to appeal to moderate or swing voters? Gingrich or Palin would have been beautifully polarizing and un-electable.
No, everything we know about how **They **have operated in the past tells me that Hurricane Sandy was not created or directed by Them, although **They **did probably manipulate the responses to best suit **Their **agenda. Why do you think Staten Island was without power for so long?
Sorry Koz, but your theories lack depth or subtlety, which is what makes them cartoonish oversimplifications of how the world actually works.
“Hello, Mayor Bloomberg.”
“Hi, this is team A. If you know what’s good for you, you’ll endorse Barack Obama for President. Have a nice day.”
“Uh…O.K.”
I love the way complex events are generated in conspiracy-land.
Careful kids, I think he’s taking names! Probably going to tell the Illumanati!
The thing I’ve always wondered is, what happens when two Illuminati disagree over something?
(Does the long-haired cat have the casting vote?)
Do you have any facts to support your conjecture, and if so, what are they?
Based on your other posts, you think voters were in control of the election. That makes no sense in context of a conspiracy theory. Why would a conspiracy go to all the trouble of manipulating voters through ridiculously complicated schemes (like a hurricane that made Michael Bloomberg issue an endorsement nobody cared about and which probably would have been the same without the hurricane) instead of just controlling the vote counts?
Obviously to not make it obvious.
That doesn’t make you a conspiracy theorist. That makes you an economist.
I believe this because I am more inclined to believe that the weather can be artificially controlled than I am to believe that the weather can be supernaturally controlled.
Because it was a big, suprise announcement that happened on the tail-end of Christie snubbing Romney in favor of Obama and during the last days of the campaign. Who would have thought five months ago that Bloomberg would endorse Obama?
No.
Let the unit of analysis of politics be the POTUS. Politics is not simple, it is, indeed, complex; for example, Richard Nixon and Watergate, Harry S Truman dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Franklin D. Roosevelt as the de fato head of the “Big Three”. The last example alludes to the fact that the POTUS is one of many HOGs.
Understand, I keep pulling back until I get the big picture. The big picture that comes into view is that there are 192 HOGs and, when the unit of analsyis is shifted from the POTUS to the 192 HOGs there is a change of perspective. It is not one man among many (the POTUS) it is many among one man (the 192 HOGs). That, as I mentioned, is not a fact. It is merely conjecture. However, it makes you wonder.
I believe that too. Also that persons eligible to succeed to the British Throne, like billionaires in Russia, China, the Americas, Europe, ect. have more in common with each other than they do with the lowly plebs of their countries of birth, and that Harald V of Norway, Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden, Juan Carlos I, et. al. are not actually Norwegian, Swedish, or Spanish.
Are you married, and if so, what does your spouse think of you being a conspiracy theorist?
At what age did you become different when compared to most people with respect to explaining the world around you.
It does seem fairly obvious that, except in places where a dictator has been allowed to take control with apparently no opposition from anyone who could do something about it, as long as HOG’s are heading in and out of power at a democratic rate, the more important people are those who remain in positions of extreme influence regardless of who is in office.
So someone has a super secret comicbook doomsday device that they used to cause many billions of dollars worth of damage and killed many people. They did that so a liberal independant big city mayor would give Obama an endorsement. I live close enough to NYC to get all my news from there. I didn’t even hear about it. But we were all kind of busy with the hurricane and all. Bloomberg is mayor of a city in which Obama would win even if he raped Al Sharpton in Times Square. In a state he was going to win if he was filmed snorting coke off Hilary’s ass. In a region in which Obama was going to win if he punched a puppy on The View. And no one cares who Bloomberg endorses. He endorsed no one in the last presidential election. It meant nothing. Its not like he is a hardcore Republican who turned. If you really believe this you are mentally ill. You really should seek help. You are having logic short curcuits and its worrisome.
And besides, the hurricane did hit. Did they threaten that is was going to happen again?
No.
24
It was breaking news on CNN and it was on the front page of The New York Times. You get all your news from NYC? :dubious:
In this post*, tomcar is pointing out that Michael Bloomberg endorsing Barack Obama might make a difference.
*Note: I am not saying that tomcar is necessarily a conspiracy theorist or not.
Your cherry picking of points that you chose to respond to would be very interesting to a mental health professional.
Like I said, those of us in the effected area were a bit busy with other things at the time.
BTW that quote you linked to does not say what you said it did. One anonymous person on a message board wondered if it would have an impact. It did not. His question was answered.
In case you weren’t informed Bloomberg is not a Republican. He broke with the party long ago. Not that he was ever considered much of a Republican except by very liberal New York standards.
But NONE OF THAT MATTERS. Because you can’t point a hurricane like a gun. And the hurricane did happen. So what did they promise him? That there wouldn’t be another hurricane? You are taking a premise with no proof or even hint of proof and then trying to shoe horn the facts into the premise. No matter how illogical it is. You are talking nonsense. I could pick ten ridiculous premises for why the mystery people sent the hurricane this way. You went with the most illogical and ridiculous one I could even dream of.
In that, at least, we are in agreement.
Are those really the only two options you can think of for why Sandy occurred? Really? Either it was created by a secret government-controlled weather machine, or it was God? Do you think those are the only two causes for any hurricanes? Or just Sandy?
Why rule out that it was just a hurricane, and it had to hit somewhere. It happened during hurricane season, and if it had hit somewhere else instead of New York, wouldn’t you have just incorporated that into your conspiracy theory? What if it had hit Boston, Miami, Houston, or even New Orleans?