Yes, when the kids are temporarily removed from their parents, the parents are flooded with free services: frequently parenting classes, drug rehabilitation, job training, domestic violence services, and how to apply for free medical care, housing assistance and food stamps. Some take advantage of the services and get their acts together. Some don’t.
The three biggest things that bring kids into care are substance abuse, domestic violence, and mental illness. And sometimes all three at once.
The is ALWAYS the preference to have the kids live with a relative. If there is no relative, then another person who has a previous relationship with the kids, like a friend of the family. Only if there is no one appropriate available who are friends or family, do the kids go to foster care or a group home.
In the case of the man who was stealing food, his kids were not taken from him. He went to the agency’s food pantry and was told to take whatever he needed, and given the resources to apply for other aid that he needed.
If the child is allergic to cats, and the parent has a cat they refuse to get rid of, is that an actionable offense or just bad parenting?
Asked more generically, is there a list of items (obvious drug use, bruises on the child, etc) that will always generate a department action, or is each case a judgement call?
Allergic as in the child gets a runny nose or allergic as in the child has running sores all over his/her body?This is a good example of why there are too many details, and every case is different.
I spent 8 years working in CPS and every case *is *different. " Messy" is not “health hazard” and and they aren’t treated the same.
As a very general rule, where I live children are not removed if there is a way to solve the problem without removing them. If children were sleeping in sleeping bags on the floor because they can’t afford beds, we bought beds. If the home was filthy (but not yet an immediate danger) we sent in a homemaker- whose job was to teach the parents how to cook, clean, shop etc, not to do it for them. Another general rule is that the ordinary foster care rules often don’t apply to relative foster parents and client families- so while my agency would not approve a foster home where mixed-gender children over a certain age would share a bedroom it did not mean children were removed from their homes for no other reason than lack of space.
As far as “revenge” reports, in 8 years I only came across one that was clearly malicious. ( although not exactly revenge- and it wasn’t anonymous). But there were many, many unfounded reports that might have been made for revenge, or the reporter might have been mistaken or the reported behavior may have been going on but I didn’t find any proof.
After seeing a Facebook video in which a young girl told the school that her dad had a lot of weed at home (when what she meant was garden weeds - i.e., unwanted plants, not marijuana,) or hearing a story about someone who underwent Chinese “cupping” therapy (in which air-suction cups are applied to your skin, but unfortunately also leave large bruise marks,) I’m curious - does CPS tend to overreact in such misunderstanding situations?
We are required to investigate once we receive a report. Usually the details can be sorted out rather quickly if the issues involve misunderstandings. Sometimes we need to get corroboration from a medical exam or psychological assessment. The issue with the weed would have likely been cleared up very quickly. The bruising with the cup might have involved a bit more investigation.
In the state where I reside our CPS laws were recently rewritten due in part to a high profile sexual abuse case involving sexual molestation. We have to document and justify every response to a report that comes in.
Reports usually come in through a central state portal now instead of people calling the local agency directly. If we get a call directly we still have to investigate and document our decision but it tends to be less involved and a little easier on families.
It is a difficult job. I’ve been doing it for 22 years. I’m a supervisor now so I don’t do the immediate hands on work. I don’t know that I could handle that now.