Depending on what you mean by “God” and what you mean by “atheist,” sure.
As an example, you could say that the “god” of Taoism is the harmonious balance of Nature. But Taoism doesn’t have any singular, discrete gods or deities of any sort, IOW, no theism. So Taoists, then, could be said to believe in a type of God while still being atheists.
I think he/she/it is referring to the “Magical Sky Pixie” or “Invisible Pink Unicorn.”
Lobsang, you should not have brought this up. You know that discussing the religeon [sup]TM[/sup] with Outsiders is forbidden. The Godless Elders will be coming to take you away soon…
This recently came up in another thread, but I’ll be danged if I can remember which one. At any rate, I’d argue against the OP’s assertion (though not against his/her point). Just as theists don’t have a single, overarching rulebook, but are composed of many discrete and/or overlapping groups, each with one or more (or no) “rulebooks,” atheists are no different. While many are quite independent and some even opposed to the idea of living by a shared doctrine, many other atheists belong to groups of one kind or another with shared beliefs and ethics. Some examples are the Freethinkers, Humanists, Bertrand Russel Society, and Rationalists. The rulebooks may be as simple as a statement of belief and/or ethics, but I think that counts.
But more to the OP, it’s only fair to say that there’s a lot of diversity in atheists, just as there is in theists. What a news flash, eh? And guess what else? Some of them are really great people, and some are in-your-face, my-way-is-the-only-way jerks…just like theists.
You see, I had been reading that as “Always Put Salt In Your Eyes.” This might go a long way toward explaining both my inability to discern surface details and my generally poor disposition.