The section of the Great Wall of China near Beijing that all the tourists go and see was (re)built in the 1950s for their convenience.
It wouldn’t surprise me if the original gas ovens were destroyed by the Soviets, who then realised the propaganda value of them and (re)built one for show. Has no relevance on the indisputable fact that they did exist and were used for mass murder on an industrial scale.
Well, I’m not sure which section you are referring to. I assume it is Badaling?
It’s usually quite common with the Great Wall that the part near the parking lot and entrance is newer, but you definitely can walk far enough to get to “old wall” at most areas.
In modern usage, fabricate implies making or creating something dishonestly, with a view to deceiving or misleading.
But this was not always so. The original and primary meaning was simply to make by art and labour. Thus buildings were fabricated, but stories were not. The word is still used in this sense, e.g. a steel fabricator, who makes steel members to order for the building trade. In fact, I suggest, except when used of stories or documents, the primary meaning of “fabricate” is still simply “construct” or “construct to the client’s requirements”.
The interview with Dr Piper was, I assume, conducted in Polish. I’d dearly like to know whether the words he used carried any implication of deception or dishonesty.
Building work was done at Aschwitz throughout the war, and indeed afterwards when the comples was used as a prison by the NKVD. When the site was converted to a museum still further work was done, partly to reverse changes made during the NKVD period and restore some of the buildings as they were under the Nazis.
I don’t know about Krema 1 specifically, but it is entirely possible that the structure that can be seeen today is post-war and therefore that, strictly speaking, “no homicidal gassings took place” in that building. That doesn’t mean, though, that gassings didn’t take place in an earlier, similar building standing on the same foundations.
Same thing in Mexico. They had no problem reconstructing things back in the early days of this century. And if a few pieces were missing, no harm done if they made new ones.
Didn’t the Nazis dynamite the crematoria and gas chambers as they were being defeated, in an attempt to cover up the evidence? Thus necessitating the rebuilding-as-memorials of the buildings where the killings and cremations took place?
I vaguely remember reading something about that on a Holocaust-denial rebuttal site … maybe nizkor.org? Maybe that was a different building or a different camp, though…
zionistfreemasonilluminatiNWOaliensrothschildsbilderbergUFOworldtradecenterzionismextraterrestrialzionists da jooooooooz da jooooooooooz! AAAAAAAAAAGGGHHhhHHH!
Jeff Rense is insane. Just look at a picture of him.
A kernel of truth appears to be that David Cole did interview Dr. Piper. Left unsupported in the text of the link posted by the OP are the reliability of pretty much every other assertion, such as:[ol]That Piper’s statements lead inevitably to the conclusion that the Leuchter Report was correct in its findings,
2. That the interview “proves” a policy, on the part of the officials of the state museum, of manufacturing evidence for the homicidal gassings,
3. That United States monetary aid to Israel is to atone for the gassings at Auschwitz and elsewhere,
4. That tourists to Auschwitz have been told that “Krema 1” is in its original state,
5. That tourists are being told today that “Krema 1” is in its original state.[/ol]Dangit, I can’t make lists work properly. Oh well. I just hope that nobody takes my difficulties with coding to be proof that the Holocaust never happened. :rolleyes:
You are correct that the appearance of this nonsense on a dodgy site is not prima facie evidence that the claim is entirely false. However, a few points to consider:[ul]
The Cole/Piper interview is some seventeen years old.
The so-called “controversy” has been debunked several times, even since 1992
It seems to be impossible to find (online) the “much longer” article by P. Samuel Foner to subject it to any scrutiny[/ul]
So, no, let’s not write it off as entirely false. But I think it’s safe to write it off as entirely dismissable and ignorable.