Avatar on DVD: What Did You Think? [Spoilers]

I saw Avatar twice in a Classic IMAX theater. I’m not sure if the people that saw it in a Cineplex IMAX were really watching the same movie as I was. The Classic IMAX screen is very tall and the effect is immersive.

I use a 42Inch HDTV as my computer monitor, so I played the DVD sitting about 18 inches from the screen and the room lights off. This actually worked pretty well, except the DVD was a little soft. I think the Blu-Ray will be better when I get a Blu-Ray drive for my computer.

Frankly, I didn’t miss the 3D that much and I was paying attention in the places where I noticed it in the theater. I thought the part where the seeds were floating around the room was pretty cool, but I didn’t miss it that much. I agree with Roger Ebert’s comments.

Roger Ebert Review of Avatar

I also like Brad Templeton’s take on Avatar.
http://ideas.4brad.com/avatar-isnt-dances-wolves-its-another-plot

I absolutely understand where you’re coming from. But I could also see some stereotypical idiot politician or CEO listening to a debriefing by Science Nerd, hear the word “unobtainium” and really latch on to it, forcing it into regular use.

I started writing what I thought would be a brief response going over possible rival candidates for the title of first big action adventure movie marketed as science fiction that actually was science fiction. It got out of hand and now it’s late. Suffice to say that the only serious contender I came up with was Minority Report, which I rejected for stupid computer interfaces and precognition.

Anyway, I know people keep saying that Avatar was a big rip off of X movie. I know you do because you keep saying it, like above… right after that charming “Ha!” bit… yeah, that was cool. And after that you made out that I’m an idiot. Go you.

Right, back on topic, I’ve seen at least some of the movies that get brought up, none of them were science fiction. They were all epics, though, so yeah, big surprise if an epic about an anglo outsider going native rings a bell. If you can point to a piece of science fiction that was ripped off by Avatar, I’m willing to listen. If you’re going to bring up a passing resemblance to some random cartoon or Western, not so much. OMG IT HAD SCENERY PORN WHAT A RIP OFF OF THE SEARCHERS.

So you’re just going to admit you’re playing “No True Scotsman” and be done with it huh?

Wow…I’m not sure how it’s possible to miss so much in the movie. A couple of points that just stick out:

  1. Who said the Mecha’s were Military in nature? In fact the movie pointed out very plainly that all the ‘soldier’ personnel on the base weren’t actually military, but rather mercenaries working for money. So what makes you think that the big walking armor suites were for the military? From what I could tell, they didn’t have any built in weapon systems. The guns they carried were separate…same with the flamethrowers and the knife.

  2. As for just using your mecha to walk thru stuff, you did catch on that everything on the planet was Navi-sized, right? So the guy in the 15 foot tall mecha wasn’t that much taller than a native. So unless you also think that a guy that is 6’4 can just walk through a jungle on our world because he’s tall, that doesn’t make any sense. And while the mecha may increase your human strength, there’s nothing to indicate that it’s that much stronger than a Navi.

  3. The “Diety” seemed pretty straightforward. An organic network that spans their entire world and is self-aware. As a matter of fact, I had a harder time with the fact that the ‘bad guys’ were so derisive about that possibility. So you can lay a human down and ‘download’ his brain…which is self-described as a link, not just a download, maintain that link all over the planet even in locations with strange magnetic fields that screw up your instruments, and you have a hard time believing in an organic equivalent?

They are machines; why would they need help to walk right through jungles? Tanks do it without any knives at all; they just roll right over trees as they please.

Not having seen the movie, I’m basically thinking of the big confrontation at the end of Aliens, when Ripley gets in the bipedal loader to fight the alien queen. If I had that exact bipedal loader, I would just walk right through a jungle without a care in the world. What minor trimming I’d worry about would be much easier dealt with by grabbing the brush or whatever with the mechanical hand and moving it aside. Sawing or hacking at it with a big giant knife that I held in the mechanical hand would be the ultimate in retarded.

Because they were only piloted by military personnel and were housed in the military barracks?

Except that again you’re forgetting the scale. Think of your average “large tree” here on earth. Now expand that to four times it’s size. That basically how much more scaled up everything is. So what you need to be imagining is something more like the Ripsaw rather than a Bradley. Sure it’s neat and all, but it can’t knock down a 100ft. oak tree.

So wearing cami’s makes someone military? I’m not trying to be snarky, but they stated in the movie that those guys weren’t military. They were all ex-military.

But neither can that stupid knife.

That’s a distinction without a difference.

I guess I don’t understand the desire to comment on something you’ve never seen, let alone carry on such a minor nitpick.

They were mercenaries using a military command structure (the main baddie was only referred to as “Colonel” throughout the entire movie). It’s a distinction without a difference, to steal a phrase.

They were giant robot sized guns, flamethrowers and knives sized perfectly for the mech suits. That’s a heck of an after-market for a non-military intended mech suit.

Again, there was nothing in the film (that I recall) to indicate that the mechs were predominately used for non-military (or “combat” if the word military is a hang-up) purposes, that they needed hunting knives to move through the jungle or anything else. It’s fanwankery to cover up something ridiculous – a guy in a big robot suit had a big robot Rambo-style knife so he could have a knife fight with some alien native chick.

Maybe someone with the DVD could answer – did any of the other mech suits have knives & sheaths or was this special to the Colonel?

The uses of the AMP suit are explained here:

http://james-camerons-avatar.wikia.com/wiki/Amplified_Mobility_Platform

It was designed for a variety of both military and civilian uses and is not limited to combat applications.

There is also a description of the AMP knife, which is three feet long and is made of a ceramic that can cut through metal. It is used for clearing brush.

http://james-camerons-avatar.wikia.com/wiki/AMP_Suit_Knife

If it didn’t happen in the movie, it didn’t happen.

That doesn’t mitigate it as being a valid reason for its existence.

No one’s claiming anything happened, they’re just offering perfectly legitimate and rational reasons for its existence. The fact that those reasons are backed up by the movie’s creator certainly helps. For someone bitching about a One True Scotsman defense earlier, you sure are dismissing evidence awfully quickly.

All of his other complaints about the movie got slapped down in a hurry. Or maybe he’s especially proud of his knife complaint, seems to be the only one he’s defending.

Yo, Justin. As I said in my post, I have considered my opinions. I could be wrong about Avatar being the first big budget action/adventure flick marketed as science fiction that actually is science fiction. I’ve posted why. Maybe you could tell me why it’s not. It’d help if you define what science fiction is, first.

Just as many people are agreeing with my complaints as there are detractors. I’m not sure what this little barb proves.

You can’t just declare a movie “not science fiction” and say that’s the end. I mean jeez, Men in Black was marketed just as much on the aliens angle as it was on the Will Smith angle.

Transfomers had giant transforming science fiction robots that were front and center in all the marketing. The new Star Trek was built on the premise of space exploration and alien civilizations. How is it not sci-fi?

What annoys me is that Cameron went to great lengths to make realistic the new world, including giving animals latin names and all that stuff, but he apparently spent little time on the human side of the development. Not once are we told what the unobtanium is for, not once are we told why they can’t mine it horizontally under the tree. All we know is that unobtanium is worth $20 million a kilo, which given the resources and lives they are willing to expend means it is extremely valuable even in the future. Anyway it is clear that it is meant to be valuable because Ribisi makes a point of saying how expensive it is.

All we know is a) it is expensive; and b) there is a lot of it under the tree. That’s it. O h wait, we are also told, if I recall very important to the human race. Why? who knows, but could it be that the Na’vi are being assholes about it? Sure. Who knows. We have no idea what is really going on except you know the Na’vi are in touch with their tree and we are sadistic assholes…apparently.