Bosstone:
…If anyone on the dealership’s side has any sense, they’ll recognize that they’ve been thoroughly ridiculed and pursuing the matter further will not end well for them. A more restrained, neutral response might not have accomplished the same thing. If taking an extra hour or two of the lawyer’s time to think up some exceptionally clever lines saves tens of hours in a more protracted legal/courtroom battle, it’s well worth the cost.
This was my reaction, as well. I enjoyed it; the Latin in the closing was like a cherry on top! I’d love to see more letters like this in my practice, where justified.
In looking at the letter, incidentally, the bottom of each page was cut off by (I guess) a line or two. Anyone else have that problem?
Labrador_Deceiver:
As usual, you’re completely full of shit & digging even deeper. You’ve consistently doubted everything from one side of the story, while labeling everything from the other side as “fact”. On top of it, you’ve deliberately labeled all of your shit as “an accurate, factual record”, when it is anything but.
Please note that explicitly referring to a detail as a fact is not the same as omitting the word “allegedly”.
Personal insults are not permitted. Knock it off.
twickster, MPSIMS moderator
ENugent
January 7, 2010, 11:38pm
143
Weird - that didn’t happen when I looked at it. Try this pdf version .
I agree, the Latin in the closing was a nice touch. I had to look it up.