Awwww…. The Great One failed to deliver for his Chicago cronies

OK. Now. Snowboarder Bo SIT!! QUIT HUMPING MY LEG!! Good boy. SIT!! Don’t make me smack you across the nose. Good boy.

Now SIT!! I am not going away for the next several hours, or maybe days. I realize that after about two minutes you’ll think I’ve been gone forever and think I’ll never be back, but that’s no SIT!! that’s not the case. I’ll be back to give you SIT!! more cheezy poofs soon.

Oh, no, wait a sec. I confused the “pigeon” meme with the “dog” meme. Oh well, both work for you. Be a good boy, or bird, or whatever, while I’m gone.

I though it was death metal group Grimy Gore’s last album

Honestly, Rio is probably more deserving anyway, especially since South America has never hosted an Olympics. So Obama spent a few hours of his day trying to bring a few bucks to the US during a recession. Why that’s supposed to be a bad thing is a mystery to me, but at least it allows to see how utterly phony right wing patriotism really is.

Guess what, Jimmy Joe – Barack Obama is still going to be a two term President. Suck it.

Do I have to read the whole thread to agree with this?

Possibly I’ll read it all tomorrow, but the title sure gives me the impression, that “Gosh, a U.S. President has never involved himself in the Olympics!”

I’ll add that St. Louis is very disappointed, as the bigwigs were (for whatever reason) expecting some events to be held here. That’s possibly related to 1904, when St. Louis successfully stole the whole circus after it had been awarded to Chicago. Hope springs eternal, I guess.

I liked their earlier, edgier stuff better…

I agree and honestly, I don’t really even care. Boo-hoo, we don’t get the Olympics. Whatever. It’s not like we’ll never host them ever again, nor while doing so will anything be done about the corruption of the IEOC (which had nothing to do with the choice, btw).

And for the record, I think the Olympics importance is and has been slowly eroded over time. I don’t think we’ll ever see another USA v USSR in hockey that actually mattered.

Quite honestly, to me, the Olympics are pretty boring. I pay half a bit of attention, root for the USA atheletes to do well when I can, but at the end of the day…I JUST DON’T CARE VERY MUCH.

There are too many events, too many participants…what is this shit, college football?

:slight_smile:

I don’t really care that much about the Olympics either, but i find your attitude here a bit puzzling.

Are you saying that the Olympics only “matter” when they serve as a proxy for Cold War penis-measuring, or some other serious international dispute? Because that’s what your reference to the USA-USSR hockey game suggests.

If that’s the criteria, i’m happy enough to have a situation where the Olympics don’t really “matter.”

As a sports fan, the USA victory over the USSR was a tremendous upset. To sports fans, it mattered.

I do not know if that is the perspective from which FoieGrasIsEvil approached his comment.

You know, I’m wondering how much other people might be leery of traveling to America considering the extent of our terrornoia?

Say what you will about the Olympics, they don’t involve anything as screwed up as the BCS.

Nah, it mattered because it was the Soviets.

Are you seriously suggesting that a US upset of some friendly country like Canada would have garnered the same level of hysteria, and the same significance in the American mind, as the “Miracle on Ice”?

Americans don’t, for the most part, give a flying fuck about hockey. I could barely find an American to discuss hockey with me during the last winter Olympics. The 1980 game was all about the Cold War, not about sports.

Perhaps - I think Chicago could rise to the occasion, so to speak, especially with a Chicago-booster in the White House. However, I think Detroit might be a city which would benefit more from an outrageous uplift in the local economy from the preparation and games of the Olympics.

As a lifelong Chicagoan, here is a hearty “fuck you”.

Ah; because saying that a political classification involves political opinions qualifies as being “utterly stupid, narrow-minded”.

The fact is that the Right Wing has made it quite clear that they DO oppose just about everything on that list.

Not from around these parts, eh? This is one of Steph96’s few hits, if you substitute “Richie Daley” for “Obama.”

Una, I’d be all over a Detroit bid, and it’s not just because its traffic would not affect mine. Chicago is a going concern (didn’t know until I took Accounting that I knew that was a Real Term); Motown could use the investment.

Hoo, yeah. No kidding. I have also seen movies about Chicago.

Detroit doesn’t have the infrastructure, the hotel space, or the support services necessary tho. It’s damn near a dead town.

[Radio announcer:] “Do you really think Iranian terrorists
Would have taken Americans hostage
If Ronald Reagan were president?
Do you really think the Russians
Would have invaded Afghanistan
If Ronald Reagan were president?
Do you really think third-rate military
Dictators would laugh at America
And burn our flag in contempt
If Ronald Reagan were president?”
Do you really think that the IOC would have turned round and slapped Chicago in the face.
If Ronald Reagan were president?"

Thanks and apologies to Roger Waters :smiley:
[Concerned Citizen:] “Well, it might work!”

Thanks for that, HA!

How many times are you going to promise to leave and then fucking renege? You keep getting people’s hopes up and then you come back anyway. Go play with your blocks or your Little Tikes or what the fuck ever toddler things catch your eye you goddamn idiot. With some more practice you might muster up the coordination required to dump your shit into the hole it belongs instead of smearing it all over the walls here.