Celestina, if someone claimed to be a poet (who was suckling at the taxpayer teat) and they began to write “poetry” about big black watermelon-eating bucks and their lavacious lusts towards white women and how niggers were savage thugs who aren’t as smart as us white folk and then referenced The Bell Curve as “proof”, would you blow it off as “saying outrageous things to get folks to think about things that we take for granted or just don’t think to question.”? Or as "a warning against apathy, lack of knowledge of history that can and does repeat itself, and just blind acceptance of what authority figures tell you to think without engaging in any kind of individual critical thinking. "?
I wouldn’t. I’d assume he was a racist. And I’ll assume he’s Bakara is anti-Semite when he uses the exact same sort of loaded imagery in his “poetry” about Jews. Even if I give him the benefit of the doubt on this one poem, which I don’t given his other spewages, he’s still promoting an anti-Semitic lie and a particularly ugly one.
He doesn’t do so as an attempt to debunk it, he doesn’t use it as a lesson in distrust, he doesn’t even have the “historical context” excuse: he’s simply repeating the same old anti-Semite lies.
And, while I hate the “You wouldn’t get it, it’s a __________ thing.” line, forgive me if I tiptoe near it and say: Even if you don’t understand or agree (and I know that you said you do), trust me. To say that 4000 Jews stayed home is exactly as evil, hurtful and offensive to Jews as any of the crap I suggested in my first paragraph would be to black people.
Fenris