When I was but a lad, my Mother would often serve me a boiled hot dog, cut into wheel-shaped slices, and garnished only with ketchup. It is one of the fondest memories of my youth, and yes, I was born and raised in Chicago.
Having reached my majority, and no longer being afraid of mustard, I have of course taken to the standard Chicago-style hot dog. (Though no tomatoes and extra hot peppers for me, please.) Nevertheless, if someone wishes to intimate that ketchup on hot dogs is morally unconscionable, or that my late, saintly Mum was somehow in error, then I shall have to ask them to step outside.
My biggest beef (pardon the pun) is the whole notion of a “Chicago-style hot dog.” Growing up here, I had never heard of such a thing. It was always just a hot dog. That’s how they made them. Of course. Then, somewhere around the mid-'80s, Ann Landers of all people praised them in a column, and suddenly all the stands were advertising “Chicago-style.” I remain convinced that it’s all an advertising gimmick or a media hoax.
(I do not doubt that persons in the less-civilized regions of this great land of ours must suffer through inferior sausage offerings. But the name “Chicago-style,” especially used in Chicago itself, is a recent and disreputable phenomenon. It rather implies, in an insidious, post-modern, culturally-relativistic sort of way, that other dogs are not inherently lesser creations, but merely different, a completely valid alternative response to their environment. To which any right-thinking person must say, “bullshit”! There ARE universal, immutable truths! If not, then you may as well believe that what they serve in New York qualifies as pizza, a self-evident falsehood if ever there was one.)
Hmm, I seem to have wandered into MPSIMS…
figment of media