The study is from six years ago. It may be completely irrelevant to this campaign cycle where you have a woman and a candidate who genuinely seems to understand and care about youth issues ad the mainstream democrat candidates. Certainly from what I’ve seen on other website forums both young men and women are engaged in Bernies campaign and demonstrate more than just a superficial knowledge of the issues involved.
Not only that, but the question here has nothing to do with whether men or women are more informed about politics. It has to do with whether political activist men and women show a disparity. That’s such a huge difference that it’s absurd to stretch that study’s conclusions to cover the current situation.
Is there a shortage? Serious question. I know there are all kinds of small private nursing schools around here (it’s a growth industry in Florida, a state with such a large elderly population), I was a librarian for one once and I hear them advertised on the radio all the time, so maybe that skews my perceptions.
This.
There is an overabundance of near minimum wage nurses(LPN), a big shortage in nurses with higher skills(RN and nurse practicioner). An LPN requires only a high school education plus nursing school.
Here’s a nice article. Choice quote “the White House is “horrified that Clinton is blowing up her own campaign.””. She sees no ethical dilemma in accepting millions in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs and large banks while also promising to reform them.
So is that Disqualifying SlackerInc? Clear ethical conflicts of interest. If not, why not? Don’t you think people are likely slightly more mad about the 2008 financial crisis and the still ongoing effects than they are about what Sanders did in the 1970s ?
This is a joke right?
Not a joke.
Here’s a sample of what will come. Some of it is misinformation, but correcting the falsehoods will require implicitly acknowledging the truth of much of it:
Ancient history. This is Clinton’s baggage, and the implications of it are still effecting every single US citizen.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-10-02/hillary-clinton-lets-big-banks-off-the-hook-for-financial-crisis
Why should the american people care more about what happened in the 1970’s than what is happening right now? Hint, they don’t.
Pet peeve: in context here, the correct word is “affecting”, not “effecting”. If you said “…are still effecting change upon every single US citizen”, then okay.
Also, please learn the difference between the 1980s (and not even the early 1980s) and the 1970s.
Which was a definitely anti-Soviet organization, which is why the Communists split off in 1919. (Also why the party ain’t around any more, in its original formation – it split up over whether to support or oppose the Vietnam War.)
The way I’ve heard that joke, the punchline is “Big decisions haven’t come up yet.”
Is Hillary somehow immune to critical editorials? “Here’s a sample of what’s to come” -> (negative editorial) could be written for every candidate ever.
You still didn’t answer the question. Why would voters care more about what Bernie said or did 30 years ago more than what Clinton said last year about the 2008 financial crisis?
Which is more relevant to the interests of the average american right now?
Again, this is such a fallacy. By this logic, “every candidate ever” is equally vulnerable to being harmed by critical editorials (and attack ads). Is that really what you think? I guess John Edwards blew it, then, by not running again this year! :dubious:
No, but I see no reason to believe that Sanders is more vulnerable than average to attack ads, or even more vulnerable than Clinton. Why shouldn’t ads focused on Clinton’s warmongering, corporate ties, Benghazi, SoS emails, same-sex marriage record, etc, etc be as or more damaging than this stuff from 30 years ago?
There are none so blind…
Right now, with Russia as our rival, and as we are fighting ISIS and other Islamist terrorists? Right now even a hint that a candidate may have been sympathetic with the government of the most powerful enemy we have ever had is fatal. All it would take is one ad associating him with the people shouting “baby killer” at returning Vietnam veterans, and it’s over.
Sorry to differ with your faith-based politics.
Let’s not make it personal, people. That goes for all of you.