This should include albums and singles. Solo works and works with bands not the Beatles.
So Wings and Travelling Wilburys count as does the Plastic Ono Band and Ringo’s All Star Band.
Pick up to 3 Beatles, but 1 has the most impact.
John Lennon
Paul McCartney
George Harrison
Ringo Starr
0voters
Note you have to assign 1-4 or it won’t accept your vote.
I would say Ringo overall, although George’s “What Is Life” is my favorite single solo track from the four contestants.
Paul’s stuff has its moments, but there’s just too much lightweight pop, or a lightweight pop sensibility, for my liking (considering his solo career in its entirety). “Temporary Secretary” is so damn cringey I get muscle cramps when I hear it (fortunately, I’ve been inflicted with it only a very times), and it alone is almost enough to disqualify him altogether. And odd as it may sound, John really hasn’t come up on my radar prominently enough to consider him, although I think “Instant Karma” is quite a nice track.
Not a Harrison song, it’s a cover from 1962 by James Ray. Harrison’s version was orchestrated and produce by Jeff Lynne and members of ELO were the backing band.
My vote goes to Paul, I think he was always the better song writer of the bunch. Anyone that brings the remaining members of Nirvana out to play with him and his band during a concert in Seattle is the winner. Hearing Paul sing Smells Like Teen Spirit with Dave Grohl on the drums and Christ Novoselic on bass was a truly memorable event.
I voted George: I like the music (especially TW) and gave him a mental bonus point for his uneven but occasionally excellent career as a movie producer.
Paul put out the most good stuff imo. George put out the best stuff imo, but had a lot of garbage too. So to me, the best post-Beatles stuff came from George, but Paul is the one I could make a playlist for and listen to it for hours. Wings and a Wilburys were both great.
John and Ringo were the ones whose musical output/songwriting was most helped by being with the other Beatles (again, imo).
I will say that if Ringo had decided to just go full-blown country artist in the 70s, I suspect I’d like his post-Beatles stuff much more. Beaucoups of Blues was amazing. He works much better as a C&W guy than a “rocker.”
McCartney, easily. Sure, he had plenty of mediocre songs, but his best solo stuff - Live and Let Die, Maybe I’m Amazed, Band on the Run, Tug of War, Let ‘Em In, Wonderful Christmastime (just kidding) - rivals his work with the Fab Four.
Lennon’s solo stuff is good, but nowhere near as memorable as McCartney’s. And you can only listen to so many songs about his life with Yoko Ono, IMHO.
There is plenty of good solo George stuff, and Ringo has his moments. But most of Ringo’s good tunes were written by the other Beatles.
Lennon had way more than Imagine. (I do love the song)
Good grief, listen to Watching the wheels
Paul’s pop songs and Ringo needing help with every album(the Man can only sing about 3 notes) I love them both.
But come on, they aren’t at Johns level.
George was brilliant but less prolific. I agree the Wilburys were a great idea and took much talent. George wasn’t the best talent there. He certainly held his own.