Actually, I don’t think there’s any specific law against a president lying to start a war. It’s just really unethical.
Tuckerfan should have personally impeached him? What are you, a retard or something? Do you know anything about how impeachment works? Impeachment is a POLITICAL process, dickweed. Bush had a Republican Congress for his first six years in office. Therefore, he was impeachment proof, regardless of what he did.
There are people in the world who march in parades with puppets, and here you are taking time out to make sure little old DevNull is knocked down a peg? Puppets!! These people are using motherfucking puppets.
Don’t worry about me. I’ll fizzle out on my own.
If you think I am powerful enough that your fascist intellectual bullying is needed here, then I can’t help but blush. It was a brilliant OP, wasn’t it? I thought of the trap myself.
The problem is that the only legal entity which can do this was, for the bulk of those years, no more than a rubber stamp for whatever the President wanted. Regrettibly, when power shifted from the Republicans to the Democrats, the Democratic leadership stated that there would be no impeachment of Bush as they didn’t want to appear to be doing a “tit for tat” over the whole Clinton flap.
I don’t want to force you into silence, I want you to shut up because you’re a brainless idiot. Those are entirely different things.
Look up fascist sometime. You may be surprised at what it means. Meanwhile, you should give it up with the whining. The “help, I’m being oppressed” thing is childish.
It’s quite telling to me that war supporters keep bringing this up. I suppose they based their opinion of the war on whether the guy they voted for is for it or not, and not on its own merits, and then justify that decision afterwards. Then they assume everyone else’s decision making process works the same way.
DevNull, omitting key details in your OP in order to potentially mislead people as to the source is considered trolling, and is prohibited. Your follow-up replies are even more trollery. Knock it off if you want to continue posting here.
Some of us went through the whole support Bush’s War thing about 5 years ago.
Most of us outgrew it about 4 years ago.
I wonder what state of delirium the OP is actually in?
Democrats favor collective self-image over the pursuing of justice serious breaches in US law which, if the charges you level are true, could lead to the most totalitarian government the planet has ever known? What a bunch of pantywaists.
Instead of maligning the patriotism and integrity of hundreds of Democrat politicians, have you ever thought that the charges are false? Especially as seeing the charges seem to come from left-wing, moonbat websites, and not anything real like from a court or a judge or a group that doesn’t employ the use of puppets in protest parades.
To boot, if you claim the Democrats have no integrity or respect for the USA, then why would they be closer in alignment to the moonbats than the Bush administration?
What else do you expect from the political party that deflects each and every one of its gaffes with a sentence starting with: “But CLINTON…” I mean, the way the Republicans keep invoking him, it’s like Clinton is their chief role model, hero, mentor, ethicist, and strategist. Surely they would not keep justifying their actions by favorably comparing them to a pathological liar?