I saw the episode again last night. I admit that it certainly looked a little too sensual for card signalling. However, I wonder if the director/writers are leaving it intentionally ambiguous.
That’s what I think, I watched lat night and I thought it was the best episode yet. More very ambiguous stuff every where…
Margie and the son on the couch??
Niki and her father in the bedroom??
The alram going off in the backyard at the end.
I also can’t believe the wierdo girl who is married to Roman stole the I-pod!!
I’ve been wondering why I’ve been so pissed off lately. I think you just diagnosed it for me. Thanks!
I have an ingound pool, I know I saw a fence at some point.
They have said a few times that they just moved into the houses. With Margie moving from the annex into her own house it makes sense that she has the least furnature. She hasn’t furnished the place yet, not having time to accumulate much clutter.
Bill owes money to Roman both for staking the store and now it seems helping with Barb’s medical expences.
The jury is still out who poisioned Bill’s Dad, I’m betting on Roman.
Odd that Roman used the guitar that is a historical artifact for a kid’s birthday party. The church and the money are his own little kingdom. I smell a slimey televangalist figure.
The bitchy primma donna stole the ipod.
I’m not sure where they are going with Bill’s brother the ex-junkie giving the son his Super Bowl ring.