Phaedrus, dear: One can lurk without joining, or one can have many names… 
… and in my old grandmotherly age, I have to admit I have become amused by flaws of logic…
E.
[[Sorry pal, I used to live in Soho and when the freaks started doing their gay pride (belch!!!) marches I left town.
Ain’t been back to live there since ]] Phaedrus
Well, at least you did something to improve the neighborhood there. Soho’s gain is some poor burgh’s (and the SDMB’s) loss.
Konrad, you should know that I reentered this thread solely for the purpose of welcoming Elenfair, my new favorite person[sup]TM[/sup]. I’ve seen you get in silly semantics arguments with many members of the board (you’re always as wrong as you are here, by the way), and I have no time or inclination to get similarly sucked in. Please disabuse yourself of any notion that my give-a-shit factor regarding your posts is anything but zero.
And Phaedrus, I’m still waiting for you to fess up that you are more than one annoying person sharing a screen name. That’s the only logical explanation for your postings to date. Each and every one of you is, for the record, an annoying, racist, bigoted, stupid, pedantic fool. Or you are all good actors, in which case you might only be annoying. Time will tell. In either case, you have my thanks for leaving my neighborhood.
Livin’ on Tums, Vitamin E and Rogaine
Konrad, get off your high horse. You know what you are? You’re a bigot who is bigoted against people who are bigoted against bigots, that’s what. Maybe you should practice what you preach.
Of course, I have to confess that I’m bigoted against young testosterone-driven males who find it necessary to prove their virility by sprinkling their conversations liberally with references to their own penises. “K: Want to feel my boner?” Yeah, right. Wanna feel my clitoris? I’ll bet it’s bigger.
“That’s entertainment!” —Vlad the Impaler
Have I told you lately how much I want to bear your children, NTG? You are the coolest.
I’m so glad I didn’t have a mouthful of soda.
-andros-
manhattan: Don’t flatter yourself, your approval means nothing to me. Ummm, just where are these other “silly semantics arguments” I’ve gotten into?
neuro-trash grrrl sez:
No, but I play one on TV.
And I didn’t refer to my penis. The character in my puppet production, who shares my name, refered to his. It’s a common technique in stories. By adding a strange or unexpected twist at the end it often delights the audience and also gives a sense of closure. After all, how many hollywood-made movies don’t have a big finish?
elenfair: Ok, let’s pretend that your definition is actually relevant, and that all bigots are obstinate. So what? What arguments have you made? All you’ve done is insult me and make a bunch of assertions. I still don’t see what your point is.
Assertion.
Assertion.
Assertion.
So, let’s see, you’ve made a bunch of assertions and insults and added one definition, which didn’t apply. So what’s your line of reasoning? Where’s the argument/proof/conclusion?
Not that I expect that kind of complicated reasoning ability from such an obvious bigot.
Good show Konrad, maybe that will show her!!!
I doubt it though.
Yo, Konrad! Some assertions are true. Not yours, but other folk’s.
Right. In exactly the same way that I did not refer to my clitoris, my internet alter-ego referred to hers.
“That’s entertainment!” —Vlad the Impaler