“My name is Chris, and I’m not in this.”
Suuuuure he did. Probably where he plotted with RFK to snuff Marilyn Manson. Monroe. Whatever.
You left out this part.
Your source, emphasis mine.
That would be a problem if this story wasn’t recounted numberless other places.
You will note that the quote here came from a Secret Service agent and not the electrician from the first story. So what was impossible to verify in 1975 soon became well documented indeed.
I am sorry for providing you with an early source rather than a later and more comprehensive one, but that was a problem with me and certainly not with this little historical fact. Given that, you may wish to drop your opposition to it.
Probably not, a whole lot of hearsay doesn’t impress me more than a little.
For my two bits, JFK was perfectly content with the rumors swirling about his prowess. Men less evolved than you or I find that very flattering. Or so I’m told.
But as well, he liked that it enhanced an image of virility and personal vigor, which was very much to his benefit politically. Christ Almighty, nobody on God’s green Earth ever really spent that much time playing touch football! And it enhanced his masculine image, very useful when conservatives are quick to press the Wussy Button.
My opinion is also firmly buttressed by hearsay. And medical records, as well.
Nurse!
Starving’s rectal thermometer is stuck again!
Ha ha ha! Oh wait, you weren’t joking. Do you pay any attention to what goes on in Washington? Clinton’s positively honest compared to most of Congress these days. And Dick Cheney could outlie him with his tongue tied behind his back (did you catch him attempting to blame Richard Clarke for dropping the ball on 9/11 a while back? He even kept a straight face!). Clinton’s long been outclassed in the lying competition.
Every President is a money-grubbing backroom sleazebag, selling pardons and screwing over the public (with the possible exception of Carter, who was too damn nice). You have to be ruthless, money-grubbing and willing to make backroom deals to become President.
And yet the electorate keep voting for them, in both parties. What the electorate really seem to want, based on my observations, is someone who is going to lie, cheat and steal for them, while pretending to be squeaky clean. 'Tis the way of things.
BTW, I’m surprised Johnson got mentioned in this thread without any reference to his behavior behind the scenes. I mean, if you think Clinton and Kennedy were skirtchasers and wheeler-dealers, whoo doggy…
Bill Clinton may be classless, but sure rakes in the dough (speaking engagements).
I have often wondered why anybody would pay to listen to this guy.
What could he tell you about aids in Africa, that you wouldn’t already know?
Like all greedy ex-politicians, he never went home…of course, what would he do in Dogpatch (Arkansas)?
I would not want my daughter near him!
Is your daughter helpless to defend herself? Or do you think Mr. Clinton has some sort of mind-control power?
And if he does have mind-control power, why can’t he get a better class of babe for his mistresses?
I believed him when he said he didn’t inhale. This is
Bill Clinton, after all. You have to listen to what he says, and what he doesn’t say.
It was in brownies. He was eating it. So therefore he didn’t inhale. Duh.
I think this sums it up nicely,
Though I really am still curious exactly what “disbarred from the Supreme Court” is shorthand for. 
CMC fnord!
Oh, and SA here’s the SCotUS page with the link for the Supreme Court Bar Admissions Form.
Now, since I’ve proven that there is a SCotUS Bar, and given that whole “separation of powers” thing in the CotUS, who do you think holds the power to disbar lawyers from the SCotUSBA?