Beat me to it, but since I just watched it here’s the video of the interview and O’Reilly most certainly does ask about all those things.
Not the Antichrist thing of course.
No, being O’Reilly takes care of that part.
Well, of course not. That Obama is the Antichrist is a thing too well-known to be worth mentioning.
Now that I’ve read that transcript that Clothahump linked to and compared it to the video, I don’t know what interview it came from but it most certainly wasn’t the most recent pre-Superbowl one.
I was poking fun at you, shitforbrains. :rolleyes:
The fact that you even think the question would have been plausible says all it needs to.
Apparently O’Reilly pushed one of samclem’s buttons.
Does that mean he got “turned on?”
Apparently you still haven’t grasped that this board is about *fighting *ignorance.
Just noticed that clothy and adaher are both posting in this thread. We’ve got the potential for the right-wing dumb-off to end all right-wing dumb-offs.
What bait might lure in brazil84 and FXMastermind?
Please, pretty please for the love of god, no. It would cause a singularity of stupid that not even light could escape from.
Critical Mass! :eek:
Somebody mentioning global warming.
Oops! What have I done?
Oh, I think most Latinists would slot ‘Hitler’ into ‘second declension masculine in -er’. To wit:
Hitler
Hitlerī
Hitlerō
Hitlerum
Hitlerō
This would of course be one of those nouns whose meaning changes in the plural. In this case, Hitlerī would be a collective term for people whose opinions differ from the speaker’s own.
I’ve never actually seen anything but the vocative used with avē, but there is a logic to it. I have once seen a second declension in -er use -ere to form the vocative, in a book called Plautus in Comics, but I have assurances from Tunberg & Minkova that this is definitely not cricket. Now that I’ve bored all the squares shitless with the above, the message to the rest is as follows: the party is at Speedo’s “house”, toga optional, own bottle and dice essential.
Who you callin’ a ‘square’? I’d say anyone that constantly talks about a musty dusty dead old language is a ‘square’.
That would be “quadratum”, btw.
And what would be the collective for that?
The People’s Popular Front for Talking Shit to the Man.
As opposed to the Shit-Talking People’s Front.
[sub]obligatory[/sub]
Splitters.
[sub]/obligatory[/sub]
bows