Goddamn Gaudere’s Law.
With all due respect, you aren’t entertaining enough for an every Friday gig. Take your cue from Adam Sandler who became rich off the angry retard persona. Once a year, or so, and people welcome your stumblefuck antics. More oftdn than that and they start to remember all your annoying affectations. The only exception would be if you are ever going to break down and tell us your shooting story. As much as I fear that it will turn out to be just another anti-climax, part of me still says angry ranting retard + gun = zany hijinks.
Wrong again. You clearly do not know how the two words differ.
It regards object/subject distinction, e.g., “He gave a gift to him.” Or “He hit him in the face with a cream pie.” Your “easy way to remember” will certainly not “get it right every time.”
On the SDMB, it’s bad form to claim knowledge that one immediately betrays as lacking.
LOL - well at least you seem to get it. I didn’t think I was being all that subtle.
Yes I am disappointed as a matter of fact.
I’m disappointed that you don’t appear to have any problem with my carefully crafted sentence. : (
Hint: See posts 83 and 87 for what I was referencing. In affect, it’s not really about noise volume - it’s about Sports Rights!
Sorry, but I am right and I offer the following cite to back me up: http://skain.tripod.com/setup.gif
Dang it - I muffed up the multi-quote of Doctor Jackson in post 124. His comment should be below the quote of mine, as it is in his post.
Right in the sweet spot AFAIC.
I asked my friend, the English teacher, if this was correct. “That person is absolutely right,” is what him said.
Try again; there’s no image there other than a notice that the image is hosted by tripod.
Also, what Miller said.
You wouldn’t be trolling, by any chance?
Guys, he’s trolling.
Either trolling, or making a sly and clever joke.
Potato, potahto.
I’m sorry you got whooshed, Trin. I’ll stop abetting.
I’d missed the “fricative anagram” bit. He’s trolling.
(Actually, “fricative anagram” is kinda clever.)
Trolling?
Hardly.
My entire first post was mocking rat avatar, whether someone gets that or not. And I wasn’t trying to whoosh anyone either. I thought what I wrote was pretty outlandish - that the difference between “who” and “whom” was casual vs. formal. You know, making fun of what he seemed to be doing?
Anyhow, when a couple of people took me seriously, I said even more ridiculous things trying to drive the point home that I was joking. Absolutely stupid stuff, thinking no one could possibly take me seriously. And yet I was, repeatedly.
Everything I wrote was intended to make it ever more obvious that I was messing around from the beginning. My entire second post, that you quote from here, is absolute gibberish. Random terms strung together in a way to intentionally make no sense at all. The fact that anyone took me seriously after that is baffling and beyond me.
You don’t have to be amused at what I wrote, but to think that I’ve been trolling would be silly in my opinion.
And I won’t be surprised if someone responds to me like I was serious even after this post.
Such is the Dope.
sich, this is the internet. If you want to post something so absurdly stupid that nobody could ever think it was a serious argument, you’re going to need to work a lot harder. Your posts here didn’t rank anything above “mildly stupid.”
Challenge Accepted!
I’m lazy, too.
But I’m also a little CDO*, and I couldn’t bear the thought of not knowing, so I searched and found this thread from 2012, with the suggestive title “I am so sick of loud motorcycles.” A quick perusal shows both billfish678 and Scumpup participating, but beyond that, it’s a total mystery.
Scumpup and billfish678 don’t seem to butt heads in that thread at all. In fact, Scumpup makes it clear that he’s just as anti-loud motorcycle as billfish678. Scumpup certainly doesn’t supply any dire warnings about the injudiciousness of confronting noisy bikers in a parking lot.
So, color me 
At least I was until I noticed that billfish678 says that it’s a recent thread. So I did another search on his handle, this time with the word “motorcycle” instead of “pipes.”
Mirabile dictu, I got a hit right away! Posts 4 and 7 are the ones you seek, andros. All a little anticlimactic, if you ask me.
But at least I’ll be able to get to sleep tonight.
*the abbreviation with the letters in alphabetical order, the way they belong
And what could offer more support with less effort than a tripod?
I give it 7-2 odds, myself.
Thank you for your tireless service, sir.
Billfish678’s summary linked above is accurate in general terms. He dropped the ball on the Bundy thread summary though. I goaded him, and others there, for expressing an active desire for the yahoos to be killed. I never have received any clear answer from fishy-fishy-fishy-ooooh, or the others, about why this particular delusional hillbilly so strongly deserves to be killed. Call it a gut feeling, but I doubt that either grazing rights or bird sanctuaries figured strongly in F-spank’s life up to this point. The safety of federal agents probably hasn’t been a pressing concern, either. So why the grubby desire to see the feds splatterkill the delusional hillbilly and his inbred posse?
When people make facetious remarks in GQ I recommend that they add a smiley, because 1) there is no argument so idiotic that someone hasn’t already made it on the board in all seriousness; and 2) there is no joke so obvious that some other poster might not take it at face value.