Provided many links and rebutted claims of fraudulence are not synonymous.
That none of your links say what you claim they say.
No but you are making the claim that its a fraud to which those links provided will unequivocally rebutt claims of fradulence and hence its relevance
Oh rubbish
Have you even read any of it
Yeah I didn’t think so
So much for honesty
And yet the most vociferous among the crtics here are the ones who have done the least amount of investigation and research into whether Billy Meier’s claims are truth or false.
So how do they know even what they are talking about?
Well they have nothing to show for and hence they resort to the inevitable tactics of infantile name calling and hurling abuses at it without any solid grounds
Me too.
Ladies and gentlemen, we’ve reached a verdict. Now let the sentencing phase begin.
I mean it just doesn’t end at how amazing Billy’s ability to tell the truth many years before our scientists have come up with their findings.
Read it?? I keep quoting from it!! And it’s the most damaging part of this thread!! Go, Billy!!
(I’ve added extra punctuation marks for you to borrow, since your office manager seems to have forgotten to reorder them.)
Gees now I find out that I am conversing with primary grade children, my bad
I read through the second link on a whim, but wow, it’s about the deepest pile of crap masquerading as scientific jargon as I’ve ever seen. It’s a never ending spew of nonsense, without basis in reality or logic. Refuting it is meaningless, as there’s nothing in it worth bothering with.
However, if you take a step back, it’s almost hypnotic in its ludicrous nature. It goes beyond pseudo-scientific claptrap to a veritable masterpiece of a mind so warped as to barely resemble a rational being. The absurd leaps of logic, the manic hand-waving, the lack of understanding of basic rules of science, rhetoric, and grammar make it a wonder to behold.
Absurdist street theater in the form of a white paper. If he could package this as interpretive dance he’d have a surefire hit on Broadway.
Thank you.
I eagerly await your first fact. So far, all you have presented is hypothesis grounded in no fact at all, and every time people present you with solid evidence (or quote back what you asked them to read and point out why it’s BS), you blow them off.
Well what have you quoted to deserve the remark ‘I keep quoting from it!’
In two previous posts you have only quoted excerpts from
Questions to Billy - Answered (From the Discussionboard of FIGU).
Creation and the Absolute Absolutum
Purpose in Life
About Billy Meier and Nokodemion
And you call this research!?
So what exactly do you pretend to have read
Deal with each aspect of those findings if you are honest enough
Yes, I have. I honestly don’t understand how anyone can look at it and think, “Yep, that makes total sense.” It’s the most absurd conflation of fantasy, z-grade camera tricks, and schizophrenic ravings that I’ve ever seen. A child could see that it’s nonsense.
I mean, what do you say to someone who looks at this and thinks it’s an honest-to-god spaceship? The picture is so hokey and amateurish, it debunks itself. Anyone who’s fooled by that, is not going to have the capacity to process any more sophisticated debunking effort.
[quote=“Gary “Wombat” Robson, post:250, topic:669000”]
Thank you.
I eagerly await your first fact. So far, all you have presented is hypothesis grounded in no fact at all, and every time people present you with solid evidence (or quote back what you asked them to read and point out why it’s BS), you blow them off.
[/QUOTE]
Ok lets deal with the metal samples shall we
But you haven’t provided any scientific analysis to back up your claim that it is a model whilst FIGU supporters have that its really a real UFO
Especially when it looks a lot like this. It’s a fancy garbage can lid. Which is oddly appropriate. Or appropriately odd.
“At this point the specimen was being carried on Dr Vogel’s person, in a small plastic envelope, to Ames Research Laboratories for still more exotic tests, when the metal specimen simply disappeared leaving the envelope completely undisturbed.”
This sentence renders the entirety of the suppositions about the alloy worthless. Without the specimen or any way to duplicate Vogel’s results, we cannot determine whether those results are true, an artifact of laboratory contamination or error, or simply fraud.
I misread this as Acme Research Laboratories, probably because the whole thing sounds like a bad Roadrunner episode.
You can’t even answer one simple question straightforwardly, can you? Yes? Or no? Are you him or are you not?
I can’t answer it myself, obviously, because I am - thankfully - not you. You seem to have a severe allergy to communicating without a fog of obfuscation.
It could be; I typed it by hand (like an animal!) and quite possibly typo-ed it.