You had your chance to answer when it was asked/you returned to the thread. You did not answer.
Just read my answer which you have failed to do so its no wonder why you are stuck with this misunderstanding
Do me the simple courtesy of reading my answer to your question and then we’ll talk huh?
And if it were larger, you wouldn’t be able to see the photographer because…
“An object of relative proportion” is not a phrase that makes any sense in the English language.
[Quote]
The investigation concluded that it had to be at least 3.5m or more
You should not listen to those investigators. They are not smart people.
You linked to a report that is not available for reading. You refuse lay out a basic explanation of why you think Meier is telling the truth, you just link back to his site as your answer.
And if it were larger, you wouldn’t be able to see the photographer because…
To include that amount detail of the WCUFO with a camera set in infinity if it was a small model you would have to stand very close to it but seeing as you see no figure standing in reflection from the spheres this means that the photographer (billy meier) is standing a fair distance away from the object which can only indicate that the WCUFO is not a model but a sizable object.
“An object of relative proportion” is not a phrase that makes any sense in the English language.
Yes it does its a common english term
http://esciencenews.com/dictionary/relative.proportion
You should not listen to those investigators. They are not smart people.
How do you know?
Just because they don’t agree with you doesn’t mean that they aren’t smart.
This is false logic
Does this mean that just because you don’t agree with me that you are stupid person.
I don’t think so
The Billy Meier case is genuine not because I said so nor because I think it so but because I have spent countless hours spent researching the material to come to my own independent conclusion even after starting out as a skeptic.
Now the problem with giving you a simple answer is because there is no simple answer to something that is so enormous in scope and breath.
It’s natural for someone like Billy Meier making extraordinary claims to come up with his version of proof material and any evidence to back up his claim which BTW only he should and can come up with therefore any materials put forth by him is the source that I will be referring to with independent investigation done by other people which is also included in the source.
All the answers to your questions therefore is in the material
There’s no part of this paragraph that even remotely resembles a coherent chain of thought.
None of those article use the term “object of relative proportion.”
I know they are stupid because i listened to their arguments, and found them to be based on poor logic, unsupportable assertions, and fundamental ignorance on basic scientific facts.
There’s no part of this paragraph that even remotely resembles a coherent chain of thought.
Well read closer
None of those article use the term “object of relative proportion.”
So?
I know they are stupid because i listened to their arguments, and found them to be based on poor logic, unsupportable assertions, and fundamental ignorance on basic scientific facts.
And that scientific facts you referred to are?
Even world reknown scientists confirm Billy Meier’s information which lends more credibility to the case.
http://theyfly.com/scientific-experts-comments-meiers-evidence
By the year 2029 majority of the people will come to see the genuiness of the Billy meier case
There is no way you started as a skeptic and got convinced by such shoddy fakes. Like I pointed out, that picture of a dinosaur feeding it’s young is a photo of a page in a book. No one except the most incredibly gullible could think it’s real.
And the only way to review the material is to buy it. Why no independent review of his evidence?
No amount of close reading won’t transform gibberish into a rational argument.
So your link, once again, does not demonstrate what you claim it demonstrates. This is a bit of a pattern for you.
All of them.
Allow me to point you up to the top of this page, where it says “Fighting Ignorance”. You’re providing vast amounts of the ignorance. We’re all helping out with the fighting part. And you seem to think you’ve mobilized some sort of unprecedentedly vast response from people here, which is cute. At any given moment, you can usually find at least a half-dozen threads like this, where some lunatic is trying to “prove” their own personal brand of gibberish, and helpful Dopers are setting them straight. In this very forum, go check out our current Holocaust denial thread. That guy at least knows how to argue and provide cites. Sure, they’re all bullshit, but at least he’s going through the motions.
Uh, oh! They’ve broken out the BLUE! Now we know they’re serious!
. . . and none of it gets anywhere near the participation and vehemence of a good old-fashioned Balrog-wing debate, or a fight about whether the Lizards used their weather-control machines to influence US elections.
About the dinosaurs
You better hear it straight from Billy
The original investigators wendelle stevens, tom welsh, lee elders and brit elders have done the initial independent review of his evidence.
Billy’s photos have never been duplicated and passed through the same stringent test that his evidence have been put through.
As yet not one person on this earth has ever debunked this case because it is true
[quote=“newinitiation, post:315, topic:669000”]
About the dinosaurs
You better hear it straight from Billy
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/The_Pteranodon_Photo
The original investigators wendelle stevens, tom welsh, lee elders and brit elders have done the initial independent review of his evidence.
[/QUOTE]How convenient. The aliens let him take hundreds of pictures, give him metal samples and then take it all away so he has no proof.
Pretty fucking careless of him to have such valuable evidence and so casual about protecting it.
Just think, if he had published it in a major newspaper or magazine, there would be no way it would have disappeared.
If he had sent such unique metal to a major lab, the results would have been widely known.
What tests? Who ran them? Where are the results?
If I, as a scientist, simply announced that I tested my hypothesis and found that it was true, I would be laughed out of my profession. Without supporting evidence - raw data - your word is worth exactly zero. If this “test” you claim has been passed is worth anything at all, it will withstand scrutiny, so there’s no reason not to make the data freely available.
No sensible person would spend countess hours researching these ridiculous photos.
Btw, all these “investigators” you keep citing are already in the UFO camp, certainly biased to find in Meier’s favor.
That’s not investigating.
I can guarantee you even the most skeptical will be convinced if you bring out some real evidence.
Fake photos and vanishing samples just don’t cut it in the real world.