I have seen “The Business of Being Born.” Like most of these kinds of prop-umentaries (is that a thing? I just made it up), there are some kernels of truth in a vast bowl of misleading bullshit. I would agree that for many births, having a midwife is a valuable and enriching experience. However, the movie shows a false dilemma between doing a home birth with a midwife, where there are scented candles and everyone is singing Kumbaya, and doing a hospital birth, with six epidurals, eight doses of pitocin and eventually both the husband and wife getting c-sections (just to be sure!).
Maybe I’m ignorant because both of my children were born at the hospital in Berkeley, CA, which might be the crunchiest place in the world, where midwives are welcome in the delivery rooms and giving medication is not a requirement but an option. But AFAIK, delivering moms can discuss potential medications with their OB/GYN beforehand and come up with a general birthing plan that can be adhered to if no complications arise.
FWIW, my first son was born by planned C-section 2 weeks late, and my second was a VBAC which proceeded extremely quickly once labor got rolling. I can’t fathom either of these births being done in a home setting. If home birth were something which only had negative consequences for the mother, that would be one thing, but you’re gambling with the life of your newborn child.