I was referring to the leg hole of the pants.
I can’t speak for others, but I don’t have to unbuckle my belt or anything. I open the fly of my jeans, drag down the briefs a bit with my left thumb, get out my schlong with my right hand and pee. As natural as breathing.
On the rare times when I wear boxers I alternate between both. With briefs I pull it over, otherwise the hose too often is folded or too low to reach or I can only open half the briefs opening, leaving my fingers fishing for the other half or, even worse, losing half of the opening while drawing the pipe through :eek:
On the rare times when I wear a belt and must urinate standing up, I use the pants fly and pull down my briefs through the fly hole.
Is this supposed to be some kind of double entendre?
No you don’t. I just unzip my fly and reach up through it with my left thumb. The left thumb slips inside the boxer brief waistband and pulls it down so my right hand can take over the important duty.
Pants in the British or American sense?
No, in this case the word is pronounced and spelled “purdy”.
“Yew shure look purdy in those man panties.”
That makes perfect sense to me. Not only because the boxers hole is easier to use, but because it doesn’t have to be stretched out. With briefs or boxer briefs, using the hole stretches them out.
I learned that as a young kid when I was trying to “be like daddy” and use my “fly.” Dad always wore jeans except when he wore slacks, while toddler/preschool me didn’t.
Yes, if I want to make the point that they have a fly.
And?
I have some with and some without. I guess I’m secure enough in my masculinity to not really care one way or the other.
I just pull down the elastic waistband and whiz over the top.
I was going to say that no amount of stretching makes the fly-hole large enough for my mighty wang to squeeze through, but discretion and good taste prevailed. As always.
(Joking, of course. I’m pretty sure my classification would be “Medium Caucasian.”)
OK. So I gave this a shot. I had to get the bottom of my T shirt up out of the way, but it works. But I’ll still be using the fly. Still easier for me. Different strokes (no pun intended). Mostly I guess this is another lesson that there are lots of ways to do most anything. Ignorance fought, or at least slightly reduced.
I must say this is a very entertaining thread.
As for me, I was raised on the fly. Un a ware. I bought some flyless boxer briefs. And spent too much time looking for the fly. The leg hole seems like a great option. I will try it.
I quit wearing underwear a few years ago, and good riddance. Useless stuff that tends to creep up my butt crack!
Now, what I really would want is a pouch between the legs of my trousers to keep my junk in. Like that codpiece they wore back in the middle ages, only it hadn’t be separate.
(Also, bicycle saddles wouldn’t necessarily have to try to emulate the horse saddle - I’d much rather sit on something like a rower’s bench!)
You’re nearly fifty years late on that. Back in the early 70s, I was in the Speech Club in high school. Everybody needed to prep themselves for the Debate Squad, so there were a shit-ton of Time and Newsweek back issues in the advisor’s classroom for us to research our talking points (which we were expected to write down on index cards). Perusing those back issues was almost as much of a time-suck as TvTropes is today.
I can still remember the day I learned about these.
It was just a tad disconcerting, and the memory is etched into my brain two generations later.